1 - 10 Next
Name calling does not rebut our argument. We have a good number of attorneys and two sitting judges who agree with it. I know you didn't read the article because you cant read and digest it in 10 minutes. You lost this one, buddy. BTW: How much are you being paid by Media Matters to troll TH?
Name calling does not rebut our argument. We have a good number of attorneys and two sitting judges who agree with it. I know you didn't read the article because you cant read and digest it in 10 minutes. You lost this one, buddy.
This article is ridiculous. Our counsels have NEVER litigated the equal rights issues, but only tangentially on morals and tradition. The central issue of these cases is "equality". The Center for Marriage Policy published an argument decisively proving that gay marriage is an unconstitutionally-unequal idea in 2011, and no law firm has yet used it in any case, despite the fact that we offered it to every major organization that opposes gay marriage. Our lawyers have been doing a great job losing these cases by arguing on everything except the core issue of equality. You can start winning tomorrow by using our argument. marriagepolicy.org/2011/11/why-same-sex-marriage-is-unconstitutional/
Mr. Shapiro apparently has no idea of what is before the Supreme Court. The Prop 8 case is a technical matter about the validity of the way Prop 8 was done. The issue of equality is not being tried in that case. The other one is an international lesbian inheritance case -- which has nothing to do with the issue of marriage itself. Now, it is true that liberals have dumped lots of marriage equality arguments into this case, in hopes the court will do as gay Judge Walker did and make an irrelevant ruling. That will not happen. I suggest that Mr. Shapiro know what he is writing about before shooting of his mouth and acting like a gay rights activist in the middle of Town Hall. David R. Usher, President Center for Marriage Policy
JustMC did not debunk anything. Rhetoric and ridicule are not substitutes for citations of authorities.
Of course education is a train wreck. The train wreck is additionally groaning because schools are expected to both raise and educate children. Schools cannot possibly raise kids because they do not have the parental authority to do so and do not have the ability to make kids go to bed or get up in the morning. My comment about Chairman Mao is a non-sequitur. I do keep a sense of humor despite the seriousness of this disaster.
Here is one Usher who has defended traditional marriage to the maximum over the years. The Center for Marriage Policy has original arguments proving that SSM is not constitutional.
Education is a train wreck because half the kids are raised outside marriage and are not ready to learn when the show up at school. Schools have to spend a lot of time doing remedial parenting and discipline. These kids would rather tell the teacher to go to hell than learn something. So schools lower the bar to try to entertain kids instead of teaching them. We MUST reverse the trend of marriage absence in order to increase the numbers of children who go to school ready to learn, who go to college, and succeed in adulthood. The alternative is to run the nation like Chairman Mao, which Obama is trying to do as we speak.
Pharmaceuticals ARE mood altering substances and qualify under this legislation. There are many pharmas that are associated with violent tendencies. Folks think it is fine to dope themselves because a doctor gave it to them. Most of these drugs are crutches so folks do not have to deal with life issues and move ahead. These individuals get more depressed and angry as time goes on because they know they are not cutting the mustard and getting farther behind. Note: Women are more likely to abuse pharma, men more likely to abuse alcohol. Note: the demographics in Utah are far different than Chicago. Utah is sparsely populated and its cities do not have large areas of dead smokestack businesses and uneducated poor.
Pharmaceuticals ARE mood altering substances and qualify under this legislation. There are many pharmas that are associated with violent tendencies. Folks think it is fine to dope themselves because a doctor gave it to them. Most of these drugs are crutches so folks do not have to deal with life issues and move ahead. These individuals get more depressed and angry as time goes on because they know they are not cutting the mustard and getting farther behind. Note: Women are more likely to abuse pharma, men more likely to abuse alcohol.
1 - 10 Next