In response to:

Why a Good Person Can Vote Against Same-Sex Marriage

David700 Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 1:58 PM
You folks are no fun. None of you know how to argue.
HarleyStar Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 2:04 PM
Jay Wye Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 3:36 PM
Polygamy is just several marriages(all man-woman) running concurrently. Each wife marries the man,not each other.
It's still better for children than homo "marriage",because the kids still have a real mother and father,and benefit from the invaluable experiences of that.
Also,while one wife can be watching the kids,the other wives can be doing household chores or working outside the home,so there's extra income for the entire group,and the kids are always cared for,there's always a mom around. No wife gets burned out,because they can take turns watching the kids and doing housework.
InsightingTruth Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 2:04 PM
If you came here looking for rational dialog, you were destined for disappointment. Not all, but most of the folks who post here are far more interested in diatribe than dialog.
Mark in CA Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 2:15 PM
I doubt that David came here looking for rational dialog.
Jay Wye Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 4:21 PM
one person's dialog is another's "diatribe".
WRT homos and their enablers,anything in opposition to their beliefs is "diatribe".
and bigotry,racism,hatred,etc.

Mark in CA Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 2:01 PM
You equate morality with legality.

Next week voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington will vote on whether to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples.

Given that there are good people on both sides of this issue, how are we to explain their opposing views?

The primary explanation is this: Proponents and opponents ask two different questions.

Proponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is keeping the definition of marriage as man-woman fair to gays? Opponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is same-sex marriage good for society?

Few on either side honestly address the question of the other side. Opponents of same-sex marriage rarely acknowledge...