Many keen political observers have noticed the complete lack of a serious jobs plan, let alone an open and honest discussion about ways his administration can spur economic growth, in the president’s second inaugural address. In many respects, this comes as no surprise: the president ran a maliciously negative and unserious campaign that sought to destroy his political opponent at all costs. And it worked. But with another recession possibly on the horizon, shouldn’t this issue have been substantively addressed at some point during his somewhat lengthy remarks? The Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Moore addressed this question in a...
Any disagreement with you at all on anything is to be regarded by you as racist. It's really despicable on your part as you are trivializing the actual horror of racism. Obama a good president? That's laughable. We have had the worst deficit spending in peacetime since FDR. We had the longest running economic crisis and unemployment over 8% since WWII. We have become a joke on the world stage with Benghazi being vulnerable without precaution and then after apologize over a stupid video. It's pathetic. Recovering? Barely limping. We had much better recoveries from worse crises as occurred in 1921 when only taxes were cut and the economy rebounded after 10 months.
- Welfare reform is officially on life support in NYC Jazz Shaw 23 minutes ago
- Why won’t the White House explain how off-budget ObamaCare money got spent? Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- Are bans on high capacity magazines constitutional? Jazz Shaw 3 hours ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 14 hours ago
- EPA exonerates Christie administration in obscure bridge-related offense someone made up Mary Katharine Ham 15 hours ago
- California energy companies are getting the heck outta’ dodge and moving to Texas Erika Johnsen 16 hours ago