Previous 11 - 20 Next
Lousy choice #1 vs Lousy choice #2. President Truman informed the Japanese of unconditional surrender for 2 months before the bombings. The Japanese government called for a cease-fire in response. Lousy choice #1: Invade Japan with millions of troops as Japan had a 2 million man army ready to continue the fight as it did at the bloody battles of Okinawa and the Aleutians and 250,000 people were being killed monthly. Lousy choice #2: Force Japan into submission via atomic bombs. Both were awful choices, but the lesser awful of the 2 awful choices was #2. Bottom line: Truman had no choice. It saddens me regarding the loss of life emotionally, but not morally. My condolences to the families who lost loved ones in those bombings, but no apology is coming from me.
In response to:

This Year's Duke Lacrosse Case

David6 Wrote: Aug 08, 2013 12:54 AM
You mean 2 large lacerations on the back of his nose, a confirmed closed fracture, 2 black eyes confirmed by GZ's physician isn't evidence that GZ was being pummelled? Or that TM did in fact have bruises not evidence? The 2 lacerations weren't zit sized, but in fact long and had caused a lot of bleeding. Anne was right. You are wrong.
Try these 2 of Martin: http://api.ning.com/files/It3-odgnrfRvXUdcbh5TFWxfZlOsn1nf4A4FGggT5onzFzAfm6VDKAezuQVkim4vdLDAbHFlEAvYUqwrc6KP5rirD6KqvSkm/Trayvon_Martin.jpg Try these 2 pictures of George Zimmerman with lacerations and a broken nose: http://statelymcdanielmanor.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/zimmerman-f-b.jpg Now don't forget to call me racist. After all telling the truth is the new form of being called racist.
Try these 2 of Martin: http://api.ning.com/files/It3-odgnrfRvXUdcbh5TFWxfZlOsn1nf4A4FGggT5onzFzAfm6VDKAezuQVkim4vdLDAbHFlEAvYUqwrc6KP5rirD6KqvSkm/Trayvon_Martin.jpg
Bill, Zimmerman didn't know that there was no recording. That's why Zimmerman responded as he did. Zimmerman believed that he killed in self-defense. The physical evidence ENTIRELY demonstrates that along with witnesses. If there really was a recording, we all would have seen it by now and the case would have been obvious. There was no recording of the struggle, so we have to turn toward other evidence.
Blacks don't have power? How many Blacks are in Congress and in state legislatures? How many Blacks have served as mayors in major cities including Los Angeles, New York and Charleston, NC? How many Blacks have served as staff for the POTUS? How many Blaks are judges. You think that Republicans don't listen? We are listening and are disgusted by the ad nauseum whining over the tiny remnant of White racism, while the far worse problems of Black-on-Black crime, high illegitimacy rate, drugs and gangs are ignored. As soon as one points out these problems the person is either called a racist or in the case of Don Lemon, a sell-out. You're the ones who should be more open. YOu shouldn't dismiss a person, because s/he differs from you and then assume the person is racist for pointing out the harsh realities that exist among Blacks.
In response to:

Liberalism Makes It Easier to be Bad

David6 Wrote: Jul 30, 2013 9:21 AM
Of course you can be good and moral without being religious, but your decency is based upon your own personal feelings that are arbitrary and subjective. Another atheist can be indecent and immoral due to his or her feelings. THere is no objective reason for not choosing the latter over the former, so it is okay by atheism to do so.
In response to:

Liberalism Makes It Easier to be Bad

David6 Wrote: Jul 30, 2013 9:18 AM
You know what i say is the truth. There is no such thing really as "social justice" as ONLY justice is real justice. What is meant by "social justice" really is a form of theft in the name of fairness and compassion.
In response to:

Liberalism Makes It Easier to be Bad

David6 Wrote: Jul 30, 2013 3:51 AM
Social justice means that you have the right to take someone else's goodies solely for breathing. It's really theft in the disguise of compassion. Because person A has $100K and persons B,C,D, have only $10K, persons B,C, D, have the right to take $20K each from Person A. That's really theft in the name of justice and called compassion. That is what is really meant by social justice. Real justice is just justice. Person A robs from person B and is tossed in jail for it. There is no other form of justice except justice.
So if Biden, Hillary Clinton, Harry Reid or Pelosi were POTUS in lieu of Obama, there wouldn't be any opposition to such policies? If you believe that, then you are a complete and utter fool.
If a Caucasian person stated this, s/he would be called a racist. Don Lemon has guts for telling the truth. He of course has already been called a sell out. It's really ridiculous.
Previous 11 - 20 Next