Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Is it Time to Throw in the Towel?

David578 Wrote: Feb 11, 2013 3:29 PM
Continue to take these moral stances, sure. But as planks in the platform they spell doom, not because they are unpoular, but becasue they do not align with the cohesive small government message that is really important. The future of the republican party is not "conservative:, it is "libertarian". Once we shrink the government, other institutions, like churches, will regain importance. Then you can fight the cultural battles where they belong...in the hearts and souls of reasoning individuals.
In response to:

Obama and Gun Control

David578 Wrote: Feb 04, 2013 1:22 PM
I don't get it. How does 277,000 pale when compared to 4,000? Is that sarcasm?
Guns are dangerous, its a fact. However, it is an irrelevant fact. We must allow people to remain armed if we hope to maintain our liberty and keep tyranny at bay. Does that mean some people might get hurt? Sadly yes. Any nation that would sacrifice essential liberty for security deserves niether and shall, in the end, lose both.
I think that psychotropic drugs have been allowed and encouraged becaus the near certain effect is seemingly random mass murders. Who would want this??? Maybe someone who needs evidence that freedom is dangerous and that free people must be disarmed "for their own good". Someone or a class of someones who seek to become tyrants.
In response to:

So What’s Wrong With Hate Speech Laws?

David578 Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 1:48 PM
If it isn't a crime to hate, how can it be a crime to talk about it? The left goes on and on about protecting the right to love whoever you want...well what about hating them. Are we selectively banning emotions now? One more question...Is it the rude language or the meaning? More specifically, would it be a crie to walk up to a gay person and say, "Pardon me sir, I hate you because you do things that I believe to be immoral"?
Unfortunately, this grand experiment, the USA, will be on that ash heap soon enough because we ignored our founding principals.
In response to:

Civil War’s A-Brewin’

David578 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 10:06 AM
I think that ad is hilarious.
In response to:

Civil War’s A-Brewin’

David578 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 10:04 AM
If you really wanted to take away guns and become a tyrant, you would need to do more than sit and wait for the right crisis. You might consider creating a crisis by, for example, pumping your craziest mindsfull of drugs that you know regularly cause "homicidal ideation". That way you ensure a regular parade of seemingly unrelated acts of violence...allowing you to swoop in and save the day.
First of all. the word is "fewer", as opposed to "less". Second, while I think you are right about whites eventually becoming a minority, I don't know how you jump from that to a reduction in assault weapons? Just so you know, the vast majority of firearm deaths are black on black street crime. So statistically speaking, the change in demographics will lead to increased firearm deaths.
That is just plain stupid.
In response to:

The Role of 'Educators'

David578 Wrote: Jan 08, 2013 2:22 PM
Wow Milt, despite trying to fluff up your sentences and use big words, your grammar is awful.
Previous 21 - 30 Next