Previous 11 - 20 Next
Obama and Hillary Clinton are masters of Orwellian English. Typically, Mr. Obama has again obfuscated language in discussing the issue of Syria. In August he stated “a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized...That would change my calculus.” What nonsense. Firstly, who is “us?” Second, what constitutes “a bunch?” Third, the red line has already been established by the international community, as he correctly stated today. If he wanted to be clear he would have stated in August “crossing the red line...” The key word is “crossing,” similar to crossing the street when there is a red light. ABC News translated Obama’s August statement into “Obama’s warning in August 2012 that use of a ‘whole bunch’ of chemical weapons would CROSS a ‘red line.” Mr. Obama speaks in ways that can be understand in so many ways. Today, in typical fashion, he was able to absolve himself of his prior statement, precisely because his prior statement meant nothing. Hillary Clinton uses language similarly, when she asked her infamous “what difference does it make” question. In her case, she offered that the murderers were either out for a walk or protesting a video. They were doing neither.
In response to:

Serious About Syria?

David350 Wrote: Sep 04, 2013 1:10 PM
Typically, Mr. Obama has again obfuscated language in discussing the issue of Syria. In August he stated “a red line for us is we start seeing a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around or being utilized...That would change my calculus.” What nonsense. Firstly, who is “us?” Second, what constitutes “a bunch?” Third, the red line has already been established by the international community, as he correctly stated today. If he wanted to be clear he would have stated in August “crossing the red line...” The key word is “crossing,” similar to crossing the street when there is a red light. ABC News translated Obama’s August statement into “Obama’s warning in August 2012 that use of a ‘whole bunch’ of chemical weapons would cross a ‘red line.” Mr. Obama speaks in ways that can be understand in many ways. Today, in typical fashion, he was able to absolve himself of his prior statement, precisely because his prior statement meant nothing. Hillary Clinton uses language similarly, when she asked her infamous “what difference does it make” question. In her case, she offered that the murderers were either out for a walk or protesting a video. They were doing neither.
Beware of what you wish for.....President Biden...??
In response to:

Mitt Rasputin

David350 Wrote: Aug 24, 2013 10:18 AM
Some republicans will stay home if their candidate is not "perfect." The result? OBAMA.
In response to:

Mitt Rasputin

David350 Wrote: Aug 24, 2013 10:16 AM
Right on!
In response to:

Who Are The Real Conservatives

David350 Wrote: Aug 17, 2013 11:17 AM
So Romney wasn't conservative enough and Republicans stayed home. Result? Obama. Wake up, conservatives. Make the best choice and stop rejecting candidates who fall short of perfection.
In response to:

Unsung Black People

David350 Wrote: Jul 25, 2013 9:30 AM
Well OK there is racism. So what?? The question is: what are the SPECIFICS? As soon as we begin to unpackage the bundle, the picture becomes clearer. This will require some fearless honesty and a look at the facts. The black community needs to look at itself with eyes wide open, and the white community needs to get over its guilt and stop meddling. And the liberal media needs to get out of the business of pushing its tired agenda.
Changing your mind can be a good thing, or a bad thing.
In relation to human history, same-sex marriage is an experiment. It assumes that we are wiser than 5000+ years of humanity. Isn't that arrogance?
And also, "marriage" means uniting two non-similar entities. Marrying two homosexuals is a misuse of the concept.
Much wisdom in this article. I plan to read more from this author.
Previous 11 - 20 Next