In response to:

Is Mitt Being Neoconned Into War?

David1454 Wrote: Jul 31, 2012 8:00 AM
The periodic spectacle of U.S. leaders and candidates flying to Israel to see which one of them can make more of spectacle of himself kissing the PM's butt is one that nauseates me unendingly. The appropriate remark on Iran is something on the order of, "One hopes that the leadership of Iran is aware that the U.S. has the ability to turn Iran into a stinking blob of radioactive glass should they ever launch a nuclear attack against Israel. And we will do so." Done.
Ahadhaamoratsim Wrote: Jul 31, 2012 10:43 AM
How did it make you feel when the elected leader of the US flew to Saudi Arabia and bowed to the monarch of that country?
para_dimz Wrote: Jul 31, 2012 10:11 AM
Cold blooded self-interest has me preferring war by proxy getting their kids killed and not ours. However, I wholly ascribe to the strategy of total war should we pull the trigger.

Has Mitt Romney given Israel a blank check for war?

So it seemed from the declaration in Jerusalem by his adviser Dan Senor, who all but flashed Israel a green light for war, signaling the Israelis that, if you go, Mitt's got your back:

"If Israel has to take action on its own in order to stop Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect that decision."

"No option would be excluded. Gov. Romney recognizes Israel's right to defend itself and that it is right for America to stand with it."

What does "stand with"...