1 - 10 Next
In response to:

What Happened, Mr. President?

Dave M Wrote: 12 hours ago (7:36 PM)
"So what happened, Mr. President? Why so much stonewalling?" Did you really need to ask? What happened was that he never meant it in the first place. Jeez Bill! Don't be so obtuse! I vote Republican and don't take what they tell me at face value! Who with a brain would believe liberals?
I pretty much assumed that except- so many people actually took her question seriously (Sigh!!!). Liberals really are dumb enough to ask questions like that.
In response to:

What Happened, Mr. President?

Dave M Wrote: 16 hours ago (3:29 PM)
Um. We are talking about Ovbama and Liberals. Since when would they bother speaking the truth? Fast and Furious? Benghazi? AP phone records?IRS practices? And by now why could anyone believe them or even know if they did?
In response to:

What Happened, Mr. President?

Dave M Wrote: 17 hours ago (3:27 PM)
1. Obama has a track record. No one with a brain would actually believe ANYTHING Obama says. 2. Anyone who does IS naive or guilty of wanton stupidity.
In response to:

What Happened, Mr. President?

Dave M Wrote: 17 hours ago (3:24 PM)
Not that difficult to understand. Liberals are liberals. This is what they do. There's an old cliche- there are two types of politicians. Type I- The ones who want the office to get that power and exercise it. Type II-The ones who want the office to prevent the 1'st type from using it. 1. Guess which type Obama is? And his appointees and the agencies they run? 2. There is a heck of a lot more Type 1's than Type II's
In response to:

Eric Holder Just Doesn't Know

Dave M Wrote: May 17, 2013 12:03 AM
I detest special counsels. They run off into dead ends and miss the main targets or prosecute meaningless"process crimes" that do nothing but wreck lives. When was the last time we actually had a special prosecutor that actually prosecuted someone for the crime he was investigating? Ken Starr and a blue dress with sperm? Was that why he was named special prosecutor? Or the numbnut who continued to investigate the Plame affair even though he knew who the leaker was before he ever interviewed Libby.
In response to:

Eric Holder Just Doesn't Know

Dave M Wrote: May 16, 2013 11:59 PM
He learned very well from the Clintons- "The buck never got here"
In response to:

Eric Holder Just Doesn't Know

Dave M Wrote: May 16, 2013 11:58 PM
Congress demanding Holder be fired is all hot air. Accomplishes zero. If you really want to put Holder on the spot- treat him with the total contempt he deserves. Who in their right mind would believe him anyway? Not that the Republicans have the balls to do it but they control the purse strings. Holder wants to act like his own little fiefdom within Obamas kingdom? Defund it.
Actually its worse than that. This is no idiot parroting what she thinks is true. This is a woman who was intended to be Hillary's replacement. Incidentally- I am not so sure they were wrong about using her or spouting these talking points. They worked. Low info people bought into it- a man was sent to prison- and is still there- expiating a crime he didn't commit. And Obama was re-elected. Romney was intimated into believing his class act act after the attack was really an un-warranted attack on Obama.
Who is dumber- the numb nuts who come up with these talking points, the imbecile who parrots arrant nonsense knowing they are such , or the dunce that claims she is owed an apology for letting herself be used as a useful idiot. Rationalizations.
1 - 10 Next
Sunday, May 19 | 08:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 08:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 08:26 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 08:26 AM ET