In response to:

Both Parties Agree: Sequestration Is Bad, but Better Than The Alternatives

Dave M Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 7:17 PM
I get the impression that TH is not so much supportive of this stance but has kind of shrugged their shoulders in a "it is what it is" attitude. Recognition that the current Republicans leadership is about as inept as can be but is currently the only game in town. Whether they have the same disgust we here show outright I don't know.
SMyles Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 7:37 PM
I agree with that too InAmerica!
InAmericaSince1627 Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 7:25 PM
I'm just glad Town Hall gives us a reasonable platform to speak our minds on issues of the day.
Sequestration Is the Worst Option Except for All the Other Options Both Democrats and Republicans have been roundly criticizing the security and economic effects of sequestration and, at the same time, taking very little action. The only logical conclusion is that both parties agree that sequestration is an awful, terrible, harmful set of policies - except the other proposed replacements are worse.

President Obama said "these cuts are not smart. They are not fair. They will hurt our economy." Speaker Boehner, writing in the Wall Street Journal, said "there's nothing wrong with cutting spending that much......

Related Tags: Barack Obama Sequestration