The debate about Pro-Life usually centers on the beginning (abortion) and the end (assisted suicide) of life. What about the middle? It is indisputable that President Obama is the most virulently pro-abortion president ever, as evidenced by his votes in the Illinois senate against measures to help babies born alive after botched abortions, and by his current love affair with Planned Parenthood. We pro-lifers tend to be single-issue voters because we don't trust the decision-making abilities of pro-abortion politicians. Benghazi validates this approach. With American lives in the balance, Obama chose to let them die rather than to help them. Why? As Mr. Goldberg says: "Politics? Ideology? Incompetence? All three?" How can Obama be trusted on anything when his view of human life is so depraved?

Really? I did not know that. Is "less than" less correct than "fewer than"? Please explain the difference. Thanks But I agree with you, and Mr. Adams 100%. Why won't these people just let it lie and live their lives however morally or immorally they want to.

In today's society, there is no bravery at all in coming out of the homosexual closet. What's so brave about doing something that everybody is cheering for? I do give Collins SOME credit for being the first to do so in the sports world, but that was just a matter of time. Chris Broussard's comments are far braver given that he will have very little public support and will have to bear the brunt of those who are not as tolerant as they would have the rest of us be. Mr. Broussard, here's to you! Great job!

Thank you, Mr. Prager, for this article. This is the best article I've ever seen explaining what is wrong with the environmentalist movement. The human life is sacred. Mosquito life is not. My son is entering college this fall, and, if that's not scary enough, he wants to be an environmental lawyer. My biggest fear is that he goes off the liberal deep end like the folks you depict. I will save this article for him to read at an appropriate time. (Right now, he's too anti-Dad to take this article seriously.) Thanks again.

Hear! Hear! Well said, Troglodite. When will people start accepting responsibility for their actions? You want to go 90 mph in a 65 zone? Pay the ticket and increased insurance rates if you get caught. You want to have sex? Let the baby live and put it up for adoption if it's such an inconvenience.

One thing is incorrect in this essay. Partisanship has always been a part of journalism. The Aurora paper spent the 1790's picking on George Washington. The difference is that, in the old days, the papers were honest about where they stood. The MSM these days tries to convince people that they are balanced. Not!

Breitbart was the only conservative who would play the liberals game. If only Romney had played that game. So, including his death on this list is appropriate. The only other candidate I'd put on here probably came too late in the year, and still has to play itself out. Boehner's loss of control of the Republican party. I'll be curious to see if this ends up on the good or bad list 365 days from now. Could the Tea Party actually take over the Republican party? Could it be the best thing that ever happened?

It's too bad nobody wears hats anymore!

Romney's comments show that he would have made a better president than he made a campaigner. Yeah, he would have looked at the balance sheet and made the right cuts and other transactions to get America on balance again. On the other hand, his comments showed that he truly did not connect with people. If he did, he would have known to keep his mouth shut on those issues, regardless of his company. So, Mr. Doherty's assertion that we have to take each vote seriously understates the case. Republicans need to get into the democrat areas and start educating the 47% on what the government dole does to society, cities, and America. That will take unbelievable amount of time, money, and effort, but it must be done.

Stop. The Republican party does not hate America. I actually believe that the Democrat party does not hate America. We have a disagreement on big government vs. small government. That's it. Democrats are winning for now. So why write nonsense like this?