1 - 10 Next
Has anyone read George Orwell's 1984 lately???
In response to:

Protecting Obama’s Right to Bear Arms

daunhin Wrote: May 12, 2013 1:06 PM
Two things, vietnamvet. 1) Be careful, the gooberment is trying to limit cars, by size and size of gas tank - or should I say the lack thereof. What do you think they are trying to do with all those EPA regulations? 2) As both a fellow conservative and Nam vet, I ask that you please refrain from name calling as it lowers you to the level of liberals who use it in place of the legitimate argument they don't have. Welcome home. Brother.
In response to:

Protecting Obama’s Right to Bear Arms

daunhin Wrote: May 12, 2013 12:48 PM
I would think even more frightening words would be: "I am the government; I own you." That, evie, is tyranny.
In response to:

Protecting Obama’s Right to Bear Arms

daunhin Wrote: May 12, 2013 12:44 PM
While I am for as limited a government at all levels as possible (government is only to be used to maintain a modest civility among its citizens), I do not see that driving is an unalienable right; it's a luxury. Luxury items are earned through various means. Is riding a horse - our means of transportation before the automobile - a right? No. One must first break the horse then learn to ride it. Therefore, it is also a luxury and a privilege. Walking, however, is an unalienable right.
In response to:

Protecting Obama’s Right to Bear Arms

daunhin Wrote: May 12, 2013 9:30 AM
Ransom, your answer to Dick4260 is incomplete. It seems that Dick4260 forgets that owning a car and driving that car are privileges, not unalienable rights. The right to protect one's self from government is, however, unalienable. A major means to protect that right is through the ownership of weapons - aka guns. I believe it was Jefferson who said something to the effect that citizens should not fear their government, but rather, government should fear its citizens. Citizens uninhibited ownership of weapons capable of overthrowing the government will cause the government to fear its citizens. Do we fear our government or does it fear us?
I was asking my wife that this morning. How can this monster who killed at least five babies be charged with murder when baby killer abortionist doctors (now that is an oxymoron) kill hundreds or thousands each per year. What's the difference, they're all fetuses.
One can only be complicit if they vote for the spineless pols.
I'm surprised that Planned Parenthood hasn't found some way to have Students for Life of America kicked of campuses.
In response to:

Surveillance Cameras Are Not All That

daunhin Wrote: May 05, 2013 8:58 AM
Big Brother watches and listens.
Wait a minute. Are they saying that global warming has a more adverse affect on women than men? How can that be? Are we not told by the progressive feminist group NOW that women are equal to men? So how can it be that women are affected more than men? Progressivism (I just made that word up to define the progressive movement's belief system - as in an ism, e.g., Buddhism or Catholicism) is so confusing.
1 - 10 Next
Wednesday, June 19 | 03:13 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 03:13 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 03:13 AM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 03:13 AM ET