In response to:

To Save Traditional Marriage, End State Involvement in Marriage

Dante9 Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:02 PM
Unlike what D. Usher wrote, or what many of you religious fanatics hope, the betting money is on the Supremes upholding the Walker ruling in California. And thankfully. Regardless, the tide is forever turned. Yes, as the lamenting Shapiro writes, you social conservatives did lose the culture war because of the hyprocrisy of your arguments and the fact that there is absolutely no truth to you claim that union will crumble once gay marriage is ubiquitous. (Nor, of course, will your rights as a holier-than-thou dude be trambled in the process.) You deserved to lose because you were always on the wrong side of the future, always prejudicially living in the past. Get used to it or let you souls burn with angst and hate. Your choice.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:13 PM
If the Federal Supreme Court overturns the Constitution of California, it's a dark day for the nation.
Dante9 Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:40 PM
Only in your mind and people like you. Most of the rest of the nation simply will not care.

How much damage has the gay marriages already in existence REALLY screwed up the country? Not a G*D#mned bit.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:50 PM
You really can't see it can you Dante?
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:53 PM
The Left has convinced you the only way you can be less miserable is by adopting the straight nomenclature. Now you're so obsessed with it...you'll take it anyway you can get it.
Like a well trained hunting dog, you'll take that straight label at the voting booth...or by judicial fiat...or by executive order... any level of trickery will do since you believe a term
ReddestNeck Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:55 PM
Oh quite a bit... the anything goes mentality is a great front for more and more unfaithfulness on the part of traditionally marrieds too. Which sends families further into the toilet, which sends society further into the toilet... you doggone well know that, and are dancing.
Cambermeister Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 10:58 PM
...a term that's not 'gay' will help you live with your homosexuality. Imagine if Dr King said yes I want the same rights as white folks and I also wanna be called caucasion.
ReddestNeck Wrote: Mar 20, 2013 11:03 PM
Most homos are weak willed and let themselves get pushed around by the relatively few bullies who are spearheading the "gay marriage" movement. Years ago, before those bullies found a voice, the overwhelming consensus of the homo crowd was "Marriage? EWW! I wanna be a wild cat. Who needs marriage?"
David3036 Wrote: Mar 21, 2013 1:41 AM
But gays have always coupled, whether they were able to marry or not. So why should we deny them the benefits that other couples enjoy.
Dante9 Wrote: Mar 21, 2013 2:05 AM
Dude, again, I am not gay. (Though mostly white.)
du2 Wrote: Mar 21, 2013 12:54 PM
You just get dumber and dumber. Dr. King was right about demanding the same rights as a white person, but he didn't want to be called white. And gay people don't want to be called straight. In each case, all law abiding, responsible people want to be treated justly as such law abiding behavior warrants. One of Dr. King's closest associates was gay. Bayard Rustin. And even when J. E. Hoover threatened both of them because of it, King took loyalty over political expediency. Ignorant cowards like you wouldn't understand things like that.
David3036 Wrote: Mar 21, 2013 7:38 PM
Unfortunately, Bayard Rustin was kept in the background of the civil rights movement because he was gay, even though he planned and organized nearly every major march and event of the movement in the 1960s, including the March on Washington that is remembered for Dr. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech.

He finally got some recognition in a book by John D’Emiiio called "Lost Prophet: The Life and Times of Bayard Rustin." And, predictably, according to the American Library Association it has been the target of protests by parents, as all gay-themed books are.

When homophobia is so blatant that it prevents our kids from receiving accurate portrayals of historic events, we should all be worried.

Within the next few months, Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely rule that same-sex marriage is mandated by the Constitution of the United States. The ruling will offend both common sense and Constitutional law. But it will nonetheless become the law of the land. With it, states will be forced to recognize same-sex marriages; same-sex marriage will enter the public school lexicon; religious institutions will be forced to recognize same-sex marriages or lose their tax-exempt status. Religious Americans will be forced into violating their beliefs or facing legal consequences by the government. The First Amendment's guarantee of religious liberty will largely become...