In response to:

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

Danielle24 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 8:48 AM
Thank you for this column, Rachel. I just read that in some Florida counties, 113% to 158% of registered voters voted. HOW CAN YOU HAVE MORE THAN 100%? By cheating, that's how. And nobody knows better how to cheat, lie and steal than the liberal Dems. The Republican party should demand a recount!
pascagoulapappy Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 9:31 AM
Wale, shoot, Billy Jeff Clinton said it wuttun nuttun but rithmetic.
RepubRob2 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 9:37 AM
Wale, Billy Jeff sure were rong this time, wuttn' he?
RepubRob2 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 9:26 AM
They'd just recount the same votes. Look, we lost. Let's move on and figure out what we need to do to win the next election. My personal opinion is that conservatives and the Tea Party (God bless 'em) made such an issue over Obama's blaming Bush for his failures, that there is no way a Dem can win in 2016 by continuing to blame Bush and "the historically bad economy" they inherited. So, when 2016 rolls around, and unemployment is still above 7%, the number of food stamp recipients is over 50 million, our national debt is over $20 trillion, and China is making demands for economic reform to protect its investment here, THEN we'll get a Republican in office. Let's just not compromise our principles to get there.

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...