In response to:

Another Reason To Declare Independence from Obamacare SCOTUS Disaster

Danielle24 Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 9:27 AM
Of all the horrible aspects of this Obamacare, the thing that sticks in my craw is insuring "kids" until they are 26 years old. By that age, shouldn't they be out of the house, taking care of themselves? Didn't their parents raise them to be self-sufficient and self-supporting? Why should I have to pay for their kids to loaf along for an additional number of years?
glide Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 10:03 AM
From cradle to death. That is the socialist motto. Never, ever forget what Obama is and his intention for each and everyone of us as he fundamentally changes America. Has any Democrat out there asked what he means by fundamentally changing America? He it seems to me he's just trying to change America mentally period.
RodT Wrote: Jul 01, 2012 9:33 AM
They didn’t say that insurance policies with middle-aged kids wouldn’t cost more! Have you noticed how your insurance premiums are trending?

Everyone thinks all these freebies are going to be free. Not until they get rid of private insurance and put the burden on that 51% still paying income tax.

Many have weighed in on the Supreme Court decision on ObamaCare much better than I could. Two of the best were Rush Limbaugh’s and Mark Levin (download the June 28th show for free and share it widely). But a few things remain unmentioned as far as I can tell.

First, the SCOTUS decision means the low-income uninsured won’t likely see any change to their status.

How is that? How can a law designed in large part to help the poor obtain insurance, a law that taxes and spends so much, end up...