Previous 21 - 30 Next
Have you considered reality therapy for spouse?
Which era of HS education are you referring to? There has been a dedicated effort to indoctrinate students at ever lower grades for the past fifty years. Now they're down to teaching third graders masturbation.
***When they can come to the table with more than anti-science mob thuggery of popular opinion I'll accept that there is something to the model.*** They can't even predict today's temperature using recorded data from the past 100 years.
It's the production of that joint that entails two pounds of CO2, not the smoking of it, and then there's the production cost of the munchies devoured by ravenous pot smokers...
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 11:26 AM
Repeat a lie often enough and loud enough...
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 11:21 AM
*** And yet, the global temperatures are rising faster than in any geological history.*** Really? http://www.nexialinstitute.com/glaciation.htm ***This analysis gives us 1070 years more interglacial, (21.07 - 20.0) but the troubling part is that the probable error (inaccuracy of data is ±1000 years) is about the same as the answer, meaning it could start any time. Other attempts to get better resolution all came to the same problem with the answer. We are due for a glacial period any time now. There is worse news. The ice cores, the Vostok Greenland and Antarctic ice cores, when analyzed year by year to show B>a temperature spike of VERY short duration
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 10:59 AM
***yet we have enough knowledge to design wings for airplanes*** As I recall, it was a couple of bicycle mechanics who puzzled out the airfoil wing shape that brought about powered flight when the elitist educated snobs of academia were still puttering around with horizontal sails...
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 10:55 AM
Up here, just East of Fargo ND, we hope for clouds during cold (-10 and below) weather. The clouds help hold what little heat there is from radiating into space. Clear nights and lack of wind can bring real temps of -40.
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 10:46 AM
You would not have the weed pollen problem up here in Minnesota where the weeds are still under a couple of feet of ice and snow. You'd want to dress warm though. Temp right now is +5.
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 10:40 AM
Milankovitch cycles. http://geography.about.com/od/learnabouttheearth/a/milankovitch.htm
In response to:

Unsettling “Settled Science”

Daniel982 Wrote: Mar 23, 2014 10:36 AM
I don't suppose that the lack of observable increase in planetary temperatures (beyond the errors inherent in the measuring instruments) for a period of near two decades, in spite of increasing atmospheric CO2 levels would cause these esteemed climatological authorities (sarc) to revise their predictions of ecological disaster due to anthropogenic global warming or global climate change or catastrophic climate instability or whatever they're calling it now to hide the fact that they've been selling a smoke and mirrors disaster to camouflage an attempt to impose a one world socialist government by means of controlling energy production and utilization.
Previous 21 - 30 Next