In response to:

Petraeus Just Another Mystery Victim in the Benghazi Triangle

DaneChile Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 6:59 AM
And your point is...? The General is retired and the woman is not in the Armed Forces..Willy Clinto fired a bunch of generals and admirals for fraternizing yet he did the same thing in the hallowed spaces of The Oval Office. His answer? "I´m not subject to the UCMJ." So, again: Your point is...?
Randall87 Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 11:32 AM
I'm betting Petreus was told by the administration that if he toed the administration line, backed up their absurd movie riot claim, and then quietly resigned AFTER the election, he would not be prosecuted under the UCMJ for the violation. This is the only explanation I can come up with for his absurd claim that it was not a terrorist act, when everyone knew it was.

Watch out! There is a cosmic force at work. One by one, people caught up in the Benghazi Triangle are disappearing.

First it was AFRICOM commander General Carter F. Ham who was given early retirement. Ham’s sphere of military authority extended to Benghazi.

Then Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette, who commanded the aircraft carrier attack task group in the Mediterranean near Benghazi, was recalled to Bremerton pending a Navy Inspector General investigation.   

And now another coincidental “resignation” in the chain of command working the Benghazi overwatch is either pointing to a cosmic force at work, or gasp! a...

Related Tags: Mystery Benghazi