In response to:

Outgoing CIA Chief: Obama Nowhere to Be Found Night of Benghazi Attack

Dan_NV Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 2:52 PM
This really is a "Big "F"ing Deal and right now it doesn't seem to be generating a whole lot of raised eyebrows. Both the President of the United States and the Secretary of State were AWOL for the entire duration of the consulate attacks in Benghazi and the fit isn't hitting the shan? Just what does either of these two incompetent heads of state have to do for it to register with pretty much anybody? Good grief!
David1735 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 4:08 PM
Hillary's "What difference does it make?" shriek put the issue to bed, as far as the LSM is concerned. How would the LSM have treated this story if it was GWB in the White House?
paddy o'furniture Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 3:08 PM
I agree, Dan...it's hard to get your head around. People are so out of touch with reality that anything that happens in the world is just something they experience through their flat screens.

Until it effects them personally, having an incompetent boob as potus is really no big deal to them......
Carlos_7 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 2:58 PM
If 300-500 dead Mexican innocents doesn't bother Santa's voter base ... I doubt the murders of a few Americans won't matter to the clucks.

Confirmed again: Obama missed his 3 a.m. phone call on 9/11/2012. Early Thursday morning during testimony on Capitol Hill, Panetta told Senators he did not speak with President Obama or anybody in the White House the night the terrorist attack was carried out on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, leaving four Americans dead including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens.

"He knew generally what was deployed out there but as to specifics about time, etc., etc., he left that up to us."

Panetta argued Obama relied on the Defense...

Friday, May 24 | 11:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 11:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 11:36 PM ET
Friday, May 24 | 11:36 PM ET