In response to:

Benghazi Betrayal May be a Cover-Up of American Weapons in Hands of Terrorists

Dan_NV Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 1:32 PM
While nearly everyone wants to wallow in the minutia of Benghazi-gate, there really is a "big picture" that must be used as the basis for examining this issue. The big picture is the current state of the Middle East and the influence that Obama's foreign policy in that region has played in bringing about that state. From Iran, to Egypt, Syria, Libya and now Israel, Obama has appeased the elements of those who fully intend to rebuild the Islamic Caliphate.
gwharpo Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 5:30 PM
Ahh, yes, little girls and boys for everyone.
Dan_NV Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 1:32 PM
The chaos in the Middle East that has now brought Israel into the hostilities is in no small part, a direct result of Obama's naiveté and ignorance of that region. What happened in Benghazi was just one consequence but none the less, a consequence that is indicative of the reality of that region. That is what is being covered up and that is a scandal of grave and serious proportion.
My3Dogs Wrote: Nov 17, 2012 2:34 PM
I say it's not naivete but intentional. This Manchurian Candidate says one thing (to appease the masses) and does another. If our media wasn't in the "blinded by Progressivism" we'd all see it and not just conservatives and constitutionalists.

In a scandal looking more and more like Fast and Furious, information is coming out revealing what may be the real reason why the Obama administration refused to provide military support to save Americans in Benghazi. Obama was terrified the public would find out that American weapons had been given to Libyan terrorists, who then used them against Americans in the attack.

Glenn Beck reported that Glen Doherty, the former Navy Seal who was killed alongside Ambassador Christopher Stevens, told ABC News that he was looking for weapons in Libya. Middle East expert Barry Rubin has said...