In response to:

Could Dr. King Have Given the Inaugural Benediction?

Dan6757 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 7:20 PM
There is nothing more despicable than every January, when conservatives invoke MLK to try and score cheap political points by making completely fallacial arguments. Oh it's MLK day? Well MLK was a Christian. Most Christians think homosexuality is a sin (read: most conservatives despise homosexuals - we can save that topic for the other 364 days of the year, bc conservatives are OBSESSED with homosexuals). Therefore, MLK would totally have frowned upon homosexuals and their movement to be treated as equal citizens. What's mostly comical about this, other than the complete stupidity of these statements, is that Dr King stood for everything that conservatives despise.
YESWECAN Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:05 PM
You are a lying, stupid S.O.-, Sorry but I can't listen to your lies anymore.
YESWECAN Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:03 PM
You are a lying, stupid S.O.-, Sorry but I can't listen to your lies anymore.
Ron-CA Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 7:47 PM
Your typing skills are remarkably good considering you are most likely surrounded by a cloud of cannabis smoke.

The Rev. Louie Giglio, designated to give the benediction at this year’s presidential inauguration, has withdrawn, under apparent pressure, after the surfacing of remarks he made, some 25 years ago, about the sinfulness of homosexuality.

Note that the pastor of the evangelical Passion City Church in Atlanta has been pushed off the stage not because of a deed, but because of words he said -- words expressing a widely held Christian belief that homosexuality is a sin.

Let’s recall that freedom of religion appears in the First Amendment of our constitution, alongside the protection of freedom of speech.

So what kind...