In response to:

Obama vs Rush: Round 2

DaleHogue Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 11:53 AM
On this posting page, can a poster get away with calling the president a bad name - you know, a really, really bad name? I doubt it. Most everyone who is opposed to the political philosophy of Barack Hussein Obama hate his guts -- is that possible? -- hating somebody's guts, I mean? I've heard the term most of my life, but it really didn't make much sense to me. My thinking on that subject tells me that hating the entire body of a person is a great deal stronger insult than just hating his guts. For me, I hate all things associated with Obama starting with the way he has somebody write speeches and put them on a teleprompter so he can read them aloud to us peasants. It's just too Disgusting!
mread Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 2:21 PM
You can say he is a socialist, racest, destroyier of our country and just a plain jerk... You can not say F#$%ing a__hole!
Larry1764 Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:31 PM
Actually, mread, socalist, destroyer of our country, and plain jerk
are phrases which have meanings and apply to our arguments.
"F#%ing a__hole!" has no contribution to make at all, to the argument or to a proper decription of Pres. Obama. Think about it.
mread Wrote: Feb 01, 2013 6:48 PM
I guess having a sence of humor is lost on you! I guess you missed the NOT!

President Barack Obama is naming names in his second term when it comes to his un-preferred media, something he generally farmed out to White House staff and political surrogates during the first term.

The president, in a recent interview with The New Republic, found scapegoats for Washington gridlock.

“One of the biggest factors is going to be how the media shapes debates,” Obama told TNR. “If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you’ll see more of them doing it.”