In response to:

Friday Fun: Ben Shapiro Destroys CNN's Piers Morgan

DagNabbit Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 4:27 PM
Piers Morgan IS a smug Aholio, no question. And Shapiro is correct about the purpose of the Second Amendment. However, Shapiro is inconsistent: in this day and age, if you really want to arm the citizenry against government tyranny, you cannot simultaneously be against private ownership of full auto weapons, as well as RPG's, flamethrowers, howitzers, fighter jets, tanks, and nuclear weapons. The Second Amendment is no longer relevant, unless you advocate this position. Should the Govt become tyrannical, the Citezens will lose the fight. Period. The 2nd Amendment was written in a time when private arms and public arms were comparable. So now it comes down to what is more important: stopping the violence in our society, or defending ....
DagNabbit Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 4:30 PM
...against tyranny.

Anyone arguing for gun control WITHOUT simultaneously arguing for repeal of the second amendment is missing the point. The amendment exists; US Citizens DO have the right to individual arms ownership. ANY arms. The Constitution doesn't say "the right to keep and bear semi automatic pistols with magazines of six bullets or less". It says ARMS. ALL arms. Up to and including any arms the military may possess.

If you're going to argue for gun control, you MUST argue against the relevance of the 2nd amendment itself.
desar Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 4:35 PM
Craig Hulet defender of the USA-USC, 2cnd Amdt, all-1-10-USC-Amdts !

kcandassociates.org
/pdfs/Saudi involvement latest.pdf
/pdfs/DimonIsNotAlone.pdf
desar Wrote: Jan 11, 2013 4:35 PM
Craig Hulet defender of the USA-USC, 2cnd Amdt, all-1-10-USC-Amdts !

kcandassociates.org
/pdfs/Saudi involvement latest.pdf
/pdfs/DimonIsNotAlone.pdf

Enjoy.

"Don't you care about the kids being killed in Chicago as much as you care about the kids in Sandy Hook?"

You can get Shapiro's new book Bullies free with a subscription to Townhall Magazine. Subscribe here.