The answer was yes. They explained that they had strongly supported Ronald Reagan, and then they supported George H.W. Bush because they had supported Reagan, and then supported George...
In response to:
I can't get the rest of my post in.Look up Glass-Steagall of 1933 & Gramm-Leach-Bliley Of 1999. No propaganda,you can read the same information at the Library of Congress.Clinton signed a new law repealing the old law which led directly to the 2008 meltdown.GWB was governor of Texas when all this went on.Clinton could've gotten Bin Laden from the Sudan,he was behind bars.The Khobar towers,the Twin Towers, two Embassies & the USS Cole were all attacked under Clinton.GWB never once blamed anything on him.To you dem trolls,that's what integrity & class look like.A lot more citizens could at least tolerate Obama if he had an ounce of these virtues!
In January 2008, at a John McCain rally in Columbia, S.C., I asked a number of local politicos to look back to the brutal 2000 Republican primary in their state, the one between McCain and George W. Bush. They had all supported Bush back then, and I asked whether, given the inconclusive wars, runaway federal spending and economic catastrophe of the next eight years, they felt they made the right choice.
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 9 hours ago
- Video: Canada’s Sergeant at Arms gets standing ovation after shooting terrorist while wearing tails Mary Katharine Ham 9 hours ago
- Poll: Republican gubernatorial candidate up two points in…Illinois? Mary Katharine Ham 10 hours ago
- Breaking: New Ebola case in NYC Ed Morrissey 10 hours ago
- Obama: Hey Georgia, do me a solid and elect Michelle Nunn Guy Benson 11 hours ago
- FBI warns ISIS trying to kidnap journalists abroad Noah Rothman 11 hours ago