1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Ben Carson Guardian of the Old Republic

curtmilr Wrote: Jun 28, 2014 8:53 AM
I've read Dr. Carson's books, and watched many of his speeches and commentaries. I like what I'm seeing develop, but he is not yet fully formed in his political persona. I realize no individual will be perfect, the Son of Man isn't on the ballot. My concern about Dr. Carson is whether or not he has the requisite fire in the belly to confront the Beast gorging itself upon our nation. That Beast is greater than Democrats, Occupyers, RINO or so-called Establishment GOP against Constitutionalist LIbertarians. The Beast encompasses all of those, and none of those specifically, and is satanically inspired and empowered with global reach. Few actually speak truth to power. At times, Sarah Palin, Sen. Cruz, and even Sen. Paul have, and the Beast has demonized and marginalized each in turn. Dr. Carson has not yet crossed the Rubicon where he too will become a focused target of the Beast. If he chooses to make that crossing, and draws that type of fire, then we will see whether he has the aforementioned belly fire, and not before. I sincerely believe whomever will rise to resist the Beast must have Divine inspiration and strength in order to prevail and restore our nation to her appointed Purpose. Dr. Carson may be that man.
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 9:00 AM
Absolutely correct!
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 8:59 AM
The analogy is somewhat apt, but should be that the senior captains of the team want to put the brash young QB on the bench rather than showing them up by rallying the team on the playing field.
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 8:54 AM
Don't be so harsh with DR. Sowell. He may be wrong in this case, but he is doing so in the hope that the GOP establishment truly aspires to the return of constitutional governance. I fear he is wrong in that hope, but don't blame him for holding it out.
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 8:50 AM
Amen!
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 8:49 AM
But the GOP establishment got nothing! Did not TRY to get anything! And in fact gave BHO more than ANY President deserved by giving him an UNLIMITED debt ceiling for the next year. Sorry, this was abject surrender and abandonment of principle with NO long term strategy apparent. The establishment didn't even attempt to slow the headlong rush into debt! There is no other honest way to look at it! BTW, I don't listen to talk shows or FOX News, so those insults don't fly!
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 8:43 AM
But Richard, that was not the ONLY choice, as I suggested below. To accept that the legislative process must be abandoned to avoid a potential defeat IS defeat itself. Both you & Dr. Sowell are, in this case, accepting surrender, ostensibly to fight another day. But this was the "another day" specifically cited LAST time! A tactical victory, however small, COULD have been exacted from the Dems, but the GOP establishment showed cowardice, not wisdom, in refusing to even try.
In response to:

Cruz Aims at His Own Side -- Again

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 7:30 AM
The play from Boehner should have been to grant a real debt limit increase, paired with repeal of the Medical Device Tax that allegedly has bipartisan support. Would Reid have Dem. Senators fall on their swords in an election year over that? Would BHO veto the debt limit increase over that? If so, the GOP challengers are handed a weapon! If not the GOP wins a tactical victory, the government is funded, with a real limit, and conservatives stood up for something. This type tactic is something the GOP base could support, instead of the abject continuing surrender by GOP establishment leadership..
In response to:

The Lesson of Dunkirk

curtmilr Wrote: Feb 21, 2014 7:16 AM
The concession that Cruz could have sought might not have been a partisan divide. Instead of Keystone XL, request the repeal of the Medical Device Tax, something allegedly with bipartisan support. If Sen. Reid order the Dems to vote it down, or BHO vetoes it, it hands the GOP Senate challengers a well honed weapon. If it is passed, it is a GOP tactical victory, and further undermines the financial solvency of Obamacare. I usually love Dr. Sowell, but he is simply wrong about abandoning the field in surrender. Agreed we need more soldiers in the Senate, but you don't get that by having vacillating leadership wave a white flag. You get that by showing your colors! Wisely of course, but a bold delineation to show a plain choice for the low information voter must be made. You don't beat something with nothing, and without making stands regularly, you stand for nothing!
In response to:

The Real Reaction to Obamacare

curtmilr Wrote: Dec 15, 2013 7:55 AM
You're right, and wrong, Bert! There ARE "Market Oriented Solutions" such as the one you mentioned. Others that Bruce mentioned are portability, national markets for insurance, MSAs, and tort reform which will all increase transparency, and bend the cost curve down. The current business-type tax advantages should be made available only to individuals as well, empowering them to be able to afford top quality insurance on a level playing field. And we lift the dead weight hand of government dictates and bureaucratic expenses. What is lacking is a visionary spokesman to champion these, and other, reforms which are desperately needed, as the administrative State is grinding the free enterprise system slowly into the ground under the studded boot of their good intentions. He or she is out there, and we need to focus support on them, once they arise, and end the circular firing squad on the right.
1 - 10 Next