1 - 10 Next
In response to:

Please Don't Shoot the Pollster

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 28, 2014 9:28 AM
"Somebody has to do it"? Why?
In response to:

No Facts, No Peace

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 21, 2014 9:43 PM
Justice isn't an outcome? So as long as the "justice" process if followed, ipso facto, the result must be just?
In response to:

A Silly Excuse for a President

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:28 PM
Willy: I didn't realize you were also competent to judge the "correct" response in a combat situation. Merely being able to take someone alive doesn't mean that it is worth the risk to do so.
In response to:

A Silly Excuse for a President

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:20 PM
English-- apparently he has forgotten that Natural Law also supports the proposition that humans should not move faster than we can run, or fly, or use electricity....
In response to:

A Silly Excuse for a President

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:17 PM
Your "Natural Law" is illogical and not supported by evidence.
In response to:

A Silly Excuse for a President

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:16 PM
OK, I'll play your silly game. Precisely what, in the "Natural Law," states that men should not accept women as leaders? If the woman in question (1) understands what must be done, (2) knows how to do what must be done, and (3) can do what must be done, why should her gender or plumbing disqualify her from doing what must be donbe?
In response to:

A Silly Excuse for a President

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:10 PM
Define "unnatural," Darby. It sounds more like you are concerned with the contents of someone's underwear than what they stand for, and we have more than enough "identity" politics already, thank you.
In response to:

An Open Letter to the Political Right

Curtis108 Wrote: Aug 03, 2014 7:01 PM
The hatred for the "establishment" ignores that the lack of an "establishment" Tea Party has already resulted in the loss of one Congressional seat. Establishments have their purposes, and to deny that leads to any candidate who wishes to to claim the "Tea Party" mantle.
Doctor, I suggest you refer to a copy of the US Constitution. Until the current Presidency, taxes were not the President's to raise, and many other things used to require a majority of 536 persons to enact.
Willy: Plwase explain exactly what the DJIA is, how it is selected, and how often it is changed, and why. Explain its relationship to the stock market as a whole. Then, explain precisely how the movement of the stock market today has any impact on the economy as a whole. After that, you may suddenly realize that the DJIA is not equivalent to the stock market, which is not equivalent to the economy. Simply because it is easy to measure and seems to support your view does not mean it is correct, valid, or useful.
1 - 10 Next