In response to:

Conservatives Should End the Debt Ceiling Debate

crescen7 Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 7:19 AM
This article is an exercise in ignorance. The author refuses to acknowledge the difference between debt and future spending. The government need not "default" on debt without new borrowing, as monthly revenue of roughly 200 billion far exceeds debt service of under 15 billion dollars. (Total 2012 debt service was 113 billion) Refusing to raise the debt ceiling and asking the government to squeeze by-by prioritizing the available 185 billion until they produce a sustainable budget is an infinitely reasonable position. It is idiots like this author who define any reduction in spending as "default" that should end their participation in this debt ceiling debate.
ColdWolverine Wrote: Jan 15, 2013 8:22 AM
Anyone who quotes David Brooks as a conservative guru has issues. Anyone who does it more than once per column . . . well, Crescen already said it.
Watching the American scene in the 1960s, historian Daniel Boorstin, invented the idea of the “pseudo-event.” The rise of television and modern mass media had produced a transformation of the news business, so that what now mattered was not if an event was important, but only if it was “newsworthy.”

As Boorstin explained, the pseudo-event was orchestrated and planned to receive maximum public attention, even if the event itself was really unimportant. Pseudo-events merely look important, because the media and the public agree to act as if they are. As Boorstin explained, the pseudo-event is not something that happens by...

Wednesday, May 22 | 03:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:56 AM ET
Wednesday, May 22 | 03:56 AM ET