In response to:

Beyond the Supreme Court: A Guide to Settling Gay Marriage

CraigWBryant Wrote: Dec 14, 2012 1:30 PM
I wholeheartedly agree that this should be up to the states. The only issue becomes interstate commerce and relations with regard to SSM. I think enough precedent is in place that the states could find ways to get a long on this without having to get the federal government involved.

As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to tackle two gay marriage issues, those of us looking for some sweeping overall conclusions on the issue should temper our expectations.

The cases to be examined by the high court involve some specifics-- the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, and the range of benefits the federal government should grant in states choosing to recognize gay unions.

Both will necessarily involve some examination of what role the federal government should play in matters of gay marriage, but neither is likely to settle the biggest questions:

What is the proper...