Michigan has now become the 24th state to give workers the right to work without having to join a union. The event provoked more than vigorous debate. State police had to be on duty to guarantee the safety and the ability of Michigan legislators to actually go vote on the measure.
So what is the controversy all about? I agree with folks on the left about the real issue. It's not about right to work. It's about unions themselves. Why do we have them? Why do we need them? What public purpose do they serve?
There's no mystery here. A union...










You lost me. Two centuries would be pre-1812. What documented worker safety are you referring to? Or did you mean decades instead of centuries? Or were you referring to non-US laws?
Some legislation:
1970 - OSHA Act
1936 - Walsh-Healy Act
1935 - NLRA
1926 - RLA
1916 - Keating-Owen Act (unconstitutional)
1893 - Workers' Compensation Act (UK law)
1884 - Workers' Accident Insurance (Prussian law)
1871 - Employers' Liability Law (Prussian law)
1802 - Factory Act (UK law)
It seems these "laborers" work from a minimum baseline and guess about fair market value of their products and services for above baseline compensation.