In response to:

PETA: Hunting Magazines Are Worse Than Porn, You Know

coveyrise Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 6:57 PM
This reminds me of the PETA gal who was harrassing a hunter with a dead deer in his truck and said, "You are horrible. If you have to eat meat why don't you at least buy it at the Super Market where no animals are harmed in the process." PETA may have a great marketing idea here however buy combining porn with hunting a whole new magazine genre could get a start.
coveyrise Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 7:01 PM
This could bring a whole new meaning to Wildlife.

When you get back from a hunting trip and your wife asks why you didn't take your gun you could just show her the magazine.

When the pictures come in from the hunting trip and your wife asks, "Who the hell is the blonde?" just show her the magazine.

For those guys who've been trying to get their wives to go hunting with them but they refuse, this could be the solution.

PETA has been causing trouble for years, but in recent days we've seen them target children by comparing turkeys to the family dog, we've seen them beg President Obama to not pardon the turkey at the White House and now, they're trying to make the argument that hunting magazines are worse than porn. 

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is encouraging national retailer Hudson News to put hunting magazines where children can’t see them -- because, “Like other forms of casual or thrill violence, hunting spawns a dangerous desensitization to the suffering of others.”

Related Tags: Hunting PETA