In response to:
Suppose you people DO manage to elect Romney. What have you got?
He is pro-bailout, pro-TARP, pro-Quantitative Easing, pro-stimulus, pro-socialized medicine, pro-homosexual marriage, pro-abortion and has a track record of appointing liberal activist judges.
Just how is that different from Obama?
And the bad news just keeps coming for the Democrats and Obama.
After taking weeks of beat downs on jobs, class warfare and campaign cash from opponents and friends alike, Obama is starting argue publicly with himself even as new data shows that his campaign may be spiraling out of control in at least one battleground state.
A day after reports that Romney and the Republicans raised more money than Obama and the Jets, a new poll of likely voters from a local Michigan polling firm shows Mitt Romney leading Barack Obama by one point in Michigan.
“[A]n EPIC-MRA...
Yeah, he's not right on everything, but on most important things he is polar opposite of Obama.
He has said REPEATEDLY that he supported TARP, bailouts and the Fed's policy. He was the author of Romneycare -- the blueprint to Obamacare. So he won't be against socialized medicine. He appointed homosexual activists to the courts in Massachusetts so that they could impose homosexual marriage. And he has a history of appointing liberal activist judges who do not respect the Constitution. He even bragged that he had appointed no judges that opposed abortion.
But the Socialists and Marxists jumped the gun, for reasons Reagan set forth, and the experiment has not turned out well for Massachusetts.
Those spendaholics will not let it go, even while it is not financially viable, but that is the way in Democratic dominated MA.
A failed experiment well within the right of any State to institute, as other States can follow suit or abandon such, based on outcomes.
I see Wisconsin becoming a State to be imitated, if surrounding States do not wish to bleed the hopeful and productive citizens to Walker's home.
he's not pro homosexual marriage. He's said several times marriage is between one man and one woman. Any liberal policies that can be tied to him can be explained away by the fact that as governor of Massachussetts he could only get things done if he moved quite a bit to the left. Given a GOP controlled congress there is no doubt in my mind that the GOP (also read as 'Americans') will cram so much conservatism down liberal America's throats they might actually make good on the promises they made in 2004 to move out of the country if Bush wins. And I say good riddance.
A chimp throwing darts would be more effective than Obama. Joe Biden, almost as effective as the chimp.
We do not expect that to be repeated.
0bama?? NONE OF THE ABOVE!
Romney has already said he is a Keynesian who believes in TARP, bailouts, stimulus and agrees with Fed policy of QE. In short, he WILL try to "fix" the economy by following the same policies Bush and Obama have used.
No one listens to Paul Ryan, and his budget is rejected, and lied about, but that would happen less.
And what was done in Wisconsin, with Walker able to do the job he said he would do, two years ago, spreading like a plague.
Meritocracy, instead of telling people they are incapable without a Nanny State.
IS it a step in the right direction? If we get the same policies that Obama has given us, how is that a step in the right direction? All it means is that the GOP will get the blame when the press suddenly DISCOVERS that the economy sucks.
Of course if that means the end of the GOP as a political entity, maybe it IS a step in the right direction. Maybe a truly conservative party will arise out of its ashes.