In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Cookie35 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 6:10 PM
I heard (supposedly) the top Global Warming alarmist on Letterman and he admitted that even if we got everything on his wish list, that there would be ZERO effect on the climate for 60, yes SIXTY years. But he said, look how great it could be in year 61. Yikes, these zealots must be high.
farpstabber1 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 8:21 PM
That is not what was said.
Cookie35 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 6:12 PM
Add to that the likelihood (99%) that he wouldn't get all that he wanted, and we are now way beyond 60 years. China and India are not going to curb there growth and hurt their people and standing in the world for a "theory." What planet are these jokers from?
Polly1 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 8:10 PM
Planet Bigmoney, I believe.

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows.

If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek.