1 - 10 Next
He is Bush on steroids.... Bush before he was elected.....a non-interventionist.....Bush after elected...neocon warmonger. Obama before he was elected....nobel peace-nik. Obama after elected...degrade and destroy. Both are destroying the nation through massive government spending.
David Stockman has it right: http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com/barack-we-hardly-knew-ye/
Its a laugh that zero thinks he will degrade and destroy ISIL. Counting the Bush 1 legacy, we are in this war for over 20 years, with no end in sight. Zero could be a real leader and refuse spending more blood and treasure over there by doing more pragmatic things such as isolating the ME, revoking all ME terrorist exporting country Visas, and any westerner who goes overseas to join the fight should have their passports revoked..... Hell of a lot more cost effective. But Obozo is Bush on steroids, who does only the politically expedient.
Yeah, you thought when you voted for Obozo there was any difference from Bush.
The beginning of sorrows, and the end of liberty, and the destabilization of the whole ME celebrated by the Katie "Panties-Bunched" Pavlich as the watershed moment of American exceptionalism. I loved this quote from VDH on the whole sordid mess of dealing with the ME, and are stupid wars: "The Islamic State is still trying to overthrow Assad. If the Obama administration is now bombing the Islamic State, is it then helping Assad? Or when America did not bomb Assad, did it help the Islamic State? Which of the two should Obama bomb -- or both, or neither?"
I agree to an extent. They have no navy, and no airforce. Their threat to the US would come domestically grown only. It would be a hell of a lot cheaper and probably more effective to revoke all Visas from terrorist exporting countries, and isolate them economically to the greatest extent possible.
"This law has made our healthcare system a lot better".... Of course this J&ck&$$ has only one metric on which to judge this.....and the metric he depends on has nothing to do with healthcare, and is full of presumptions that people who enrolled in the ACA actually paid for their insurance.
In response to:

Ann Coulter's Conservative Sell-Out

Contra Mundum Wrote: Feb 05, 2014 3:45 PM
2008.....TH must be out of material.
In response to:

Ann Coulter's Conservative Sell-Out

Contra Mundum Wrote: Feb 05, 2014 3:44 PM
They are so far right that they are left.
It can be defeated, eh? Not to defend BHO, but I always find it ironic....it was Bush who fought to bring "democracy" to the ME....and he was preceeded by a long line of ME interventionists. Now, I imagine that most TH'ers are ideological follwers of the cult of neoconservatism....but why in the world would you take on a religion whose adherents number in the range of 1.6Billion world-wide. Just how will you defeat 1.6Billion without genocide and whose "ideology" has no compassion when it comes to the infidel. And consider the costs left in the wake of Bush in his decades war against this ideology....talk about wicked evil....and the cult of dominating the entire world.
1 - 10 Next