I question your ability to read.

Don't you wish government spending would plot in that direction.

The central planners picks the winners and the losers....by the standard of what will help them maintain their power in the present no matter the consequences. By the time all the damage is done, they are long gone, no where in sight, having laughed all the way to the bank. This applies to those who negotiated social security Medicare Medicare part D Union Benefits and of course the easy money policies since Greenspan.

Gina's article is evidence of why John Lott is not far off the mark: "If we took away women's right to vote, we'd never have to worry about another Democrat president. It's kind of a pipe dream, it's a personal fantasy of mine, but I don't think it's going to happen." -Ann Coulter See: http://johnrlott.tripod.com/op-eds/WashTimesWomensSuff112707.html

Horse-shiiiite. I just did, a paid ad of Sicko Rickos at the top. Followed by Wikipedia.....then finallly ricksantorum.com.

So what of it? More brain dead logic,.....Do you think Ron Paul wants the government to shut Rush off the air....really?

What brain dead logic is this? Did he really support Fluke? Do you think Ron Paul really supports the government providing birth control....really?

Of course Sage really wants is foreign intervention and perpetual unfunded war paid for by posterity.

Sage pretty sums up the state of the republican party, labels Ron Paul neo-liberal. Of course consulting wikipedia on neoliberal, some of the definitions that might fit Paul. Neoliberalism seeks to transfer control of the economy from public to the private sector, 1) Governments should not run large deficits that have to be paid back by future citizens 2) broadening the tax base and adopting moderate marginal tax rates to encourage innovation and efficiency; (actually Paul wants to abolish Federal income tax) 3) Interest rates that are market determined and positive (but moderate) in real terms 4) abolition of regulations that impede market entry or restrict competition 5) Legal security for property rights

This response pretty much sums up the state of the republican party....the stupid party full of stupid twits.....