Ann is not "in love with Romney"; Ann is simply for the ONLY electable candidate we unfortunately have now. Had we any wider choice, Ann would definitely pick the best REAL candidate. Can you offer one? Ron Paul? Newt Gingrich (whom, btw., I love very much for his great intellectualism and knowledge)? Who? Who has enough brain and a real chance to gather a campaign staff, money, and delegate votes to oust the Disaster-in-Chief? Name me one, and I will vote for such a perfect candidate with all my heart.

With passive and/or indifferent majority of parents, we managed to build a school education system that educates NOTHING but Lefty propaganda. So, our [idiotic] tolerance, political correctness and passivity "awarded" us with what we deserve. My very bad opinion of the school education system is based not on my imagination, but rather on the actual observation of what and how my grandchildren are being taught (so I have to re-teach them until their parents return from their job.) I recall my school in Moscow 60 years ago, and I have to say that the Soviet school was incomparably better in terms of volume of knowledge given to students. It was even much less Commie propaganda than in nowadays Americans schools. Amazing!

As soon as the French revolutionaries adopted and raised the Antoine-François Momoro's slogan "Liberté, égalité, fraternité," they immediately made dozens of thousands of citoyennes very much free and fraternally equal...by guillotining them: headless bodies look very much free and fraternally equal. Then revolutionaries of Russia successfully improved methods of "libertization, eqalizaion and fraternization": instead of guillotines, they used labor camps, bullets, famines and other means implied by human-loving Marxism-Leninism, which allowed them to "fraternize" DOZENS OF MILLIONS of Russians. Then the baton was picked up by Mongolian revolutionaries, then by Chinese, Cuban and other revolutionaries. Not too much liberté?

We are not talking here about childless males and females in a barren (infertile) marriage: it's usually a family drama, but of course, such parents can and more often than rare are outstanding foster parents. We are talking here about ONE-SEX couples - male or female, which is by definition not the best environment for kids to be bred as normal straight kids. With all their alleged love and care, homosexuals can not give a child a full-fledged, full value upbringing: either masculine or feminine components will inevitably be always missing.

I had a friend, a great pianist, Naum Shtarkman, whom we worked and played together before his arrest in 1958 (for homosexuality) and thereafter, after 1967. You may want to listen to his performance at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TG-Tcg06Qk . Before his arrest, he was married and had kids, which proves that his further homosexuality was not genetically inherited, but rather a means to "decorate" his normal sexual activity with some additional fantasies. It didn't hurt me in any way, because he didn't exhibit his sexual life on a public stage, as our rabid homosexuals are doing. That's why we kept being friends when he was released.

"You write like you never made out of grade school and that's sad because your thoughts are making no sense." ?????????????????????????? It's not because of my clumsy English, it's because of your clumsy brain: intelligent polite people (who don't falsify facts to please themselves) have no problems conversing with me. By the way, accusing a person whose native language is not English, shows not much intelligence of the accuser. Try to talk with me in my language, OK?

"You write like you never made out of grade school and that's sad because your thoughts are making no sense." ?????????????????????????? It's not because of my clumsy English, it's because of your clumsy brain: intelligent polite people (who don't falsify facts to please themselves) have no problems conversing with me.

"this didn't really make a lot of sense" ?????????????????????????? It's not because of my clumsy English, it's because of your clumsy brain: intelligent polite people have no problems conversing with me.

I did not say neither meant "assaulted." I meant that there is only a slim chance that kids who are fostered by homosexuals will grow up as normal kids. It's the direct way to multiply the number of "artificial" homosexuals.

Honestly, I am sick of endless curtsies to homosexuals. Homosexuals by definition do not procreate. Therefore, neither Fathers Fay, nor Mothers Day apply. In the last resort, we can talk about a Foster Parents Day, which would be me personally make puke, because in my most dreadful dream I wouldn't imagine kids being screwed by homosexual pairs.