The first word in your response was, "Correct." You should have stopped there.

If EVERY legislative gun control wet dream of Obama and all the leftists had magically been passed into law... Newtown would still have happened. If faculty, staff, or administration inside the elementary school had been allowed to carry a side arm, the Newtown killings might have been stopped or minimized. If these parents really want to see gun violence stopped, they should insist that restrictions on gun ownership be lessened for law abiding citizens.

"Conservatives don't have the stomach for playing dirty and that's the only way liberals know how to play." You're mistakenly conflating the terms conservative and Republican. Republicans have demonstrated no stomach for opposing Obama. The only people Republicans seem to be in opposition to are conservatives. Conservatives need to take over the Republican Party and provide a distinct alternative to the Socialist Democrats for the American people to have a clear choice.

Want proof that the IRS was simply following orders from the administration? Sara Hall Ingram, the supervisor who directed the intimidation tactics against conservative groups, has been promoted to head the IRS oversight of ObamaCare where she will now get to intimidate everyone --- not just conservatives.

Liberals kill their offspring while conservatives send their children to be indoctrinated at government schools and universities. Your calculation is a wash until conservative parents stop subjecting their offspring to the liberal brainwashing in the schools and in the popular culture.

People who exercise their Constitutional right to own a gun, serve as a civilized restraint against the barbarians in our society yet this administration characterizes gun owners as the barbarians.

Tinsldr2 Wrote: "If a supervisor of the DOJ stands up at work and daily calls Conservatives and Christians names, attacks tea paritiers and as a representative of the company makes a hostile work environment for conservatives, he is not breaking the law so his free speech is not violated." Tinsldr2, understand that if a supervisor at DOJ (a government agency) sets a policy that forces employees to endorse something of which they disapprove, he is violating their rights and is violating his agency's responsibility to uphold the 1st amendment free speech rights guaranteed by the Constitution. On the other hand, if a supervisor at Burger King (where you obviously work, Tinsldr2) sets a policy that forces employees to endorse something of which they disapprove, he is within his rights to terminate the employment of someone who violates company (a private company) policy. See the difference, Tinsldr2? (somehow, I don't think you can)

"Of course he handed out bonuses." Bonuses and a performance promotion. The "woman" who was so effective in intimidating TEA Party groups has been promoted to oversee ObamaCare so she can now intimidate the rest of America.

"If you have a gov Job, while at work you must follow the work rules. Just because it is for a gov agency does not change that." Once again, a government agency is bound by law to adhere to Constitutional guarantees of 1st amendment free speech rights. If a totalitarian regime sets a policy that violates the constitution, those policies should not be followed, they should be fought and sanctioned. (I'm sure she still doesn't get it, folks, but Tinsldr2's silliness simply should not go unanswered)

Be sure to tell us about those demonstrations. It's a sure bet the MSM will not be covering them...

Tinsldr2 Wrote: "When you have a job as a supervisor and you are on company time you are expected to promote, follow and enforce company policy as long as that policy is constitutional and legal." Tinsldr2, I'll type this real slow (again) so MAYBE you can begin to comprehend: The DOJ is not a "company" and the topic is not about "company policy." This is about a government agency that is bound by law to adhere to Constitutional guarantees of 1st amendment free speech rights. This is about a totalitarian regime that is inhabiting the executive branch and is imposing anti-America values through its surrogates in the DOJ (that's Department of Justice, Tin). Next time, try to read the column before polluting the comments section with your irrelevant points that might actually be relevant if the column were pointing out the way the left is trying to impose its values on a private company, not a column about the way a government agency is violating the Constitution.