Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

The Intellectual Poverty Law Center

ConcealedCarry Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 11:29 AM
Be specific, pappy, be specific. If you're talking about doctrine, please go to another site. Otherwise, don't make a charge without identifying and verifying the one (s) against whom you are making that charge. If you are liar don't respond.
AlanfromBigEasy Wrote: "This column is just a hate filled fantasy from the Radical Right. Divorced from reality, as are many/most Radical Right beliefs." Nice satire, Alan. It's sad that your silly sentences actually ring true as an accurate portrayal of leftist rhetoric in the 21st century.
The Original King Wrote: “Prager is a rather pathetic person. I really want all liberals to have a happy 4th of July and all conservatives to have a krappy one. Regarding the issue of being divisive, what is there not to understand? Prager actually still insists that the anger and demonetization comes almost exclusively from the left. I have no problem with people who disagree with me ..........and THAT is probably why Prager is having difficulty even hitting 100 comments to his columns any more.” ... brilliant as ever, TOK, I hope you enjoy seeing all the flags commemorating the independence of the greatest nation in the history of the world since the Redskins' nation was assimilated...
(NOTE about TOK: old geezers with iPads are a menace to intelligent discourse on this site)
The Original King Wrote: " point is that IF society is as anti-cigar as Prager whines about, then any CURRENT discussion about Red would focus on how bad of a person he was for smoking cigars.....and that simply is NOT the case. It's a non-issue" ... case-in-point! "(NOTE: old geezers with iPads are a menace to intelligent discourse on this site)"
FLMC and TOK are clueless. They both need to go back inside to the cafeteria in their care center, finish reading the New York Times, and take a nap so they can be fresh for the "early bird special" at 4:30. (NOTE: old geezers with iPads are a menace to intelligent discourse on this site)
Garcetti is clearly clueless and stupid. If he was just, "trying to relate to the people," he failed miserably since almost half of the people in his city probably find public use of profanity to be offensive. On the other hand, if he was TRYING to be "cutting edge" or offensive, he failed miserably since a large number of his fellow drunks applauded him. Next time, Mayor, if you want to be truly offensive, do the following: Light up a big cigar, take a puff, then say, "Let's bow for a moment of silence to thank God for empowering the Kings to win," that way you can offend EVERYONE. The best thing for a mayor to do is simply say, "Congratulations," and allow the team that won to be the story, rather than a mayor who has nothing to do with their winning the Stanley Cup.
In response to:

The Top 8 Things to Think About

ConcealedCarry Wrote: Jun 23, 2014 10:14 AM
"When I read junk like this, by people who can't differentiate between fact and opinion, I thank GOD I'm agnostic." Flat-earth is clearly making a poor and foolish attempt at satire. Otherwise, she would simply disagree with Barber's OPINION-PIECE, rather than accusing him of not being able to differentiate between fact and opinion. That, and the part about an agnostic giving thanks to God, seems to clearly indicate satire.
OK. I'm ashamed to admit it, but I read it as a child. I also read all of the Chronicles of Narnia as a child. On the other hand, I would never call anyone uneducated who never read "Lord of the Rings." Now, someone like you, TinDim, who is Biblically illterate --- I would call YOU uneducated.
At least TinDim is consistent. Take nothing he says seriously.
"Lord of the Rings?" - classical literature? Me --- lack of knowledge? Au contraire on both counts! I believe that "Lord of the Rings" was a JRR Tolkien book (which, by the way, I never read) that was written in the early to mid-20th century. That may be "classical" to you, but it seems to me more like pop culture, based on the fact that most have only seen the movie and never read the book... P.S. I was using your "Thou shalt not pass" quote as an opportunity to make bad jokes about Obama and methane expulsion. Thanks for the opportunity! P.P.S. This comment is also an attempt at sarcasm or sardonic humor. In fact, most of my comments on this site are not serious, except when I'm responding to certain miscreants. Amy, you are DEFINITELY not one of those miscreants. :-)
Previous 11 - 20 Next