"Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PN)" I don't know where "PN" is, but I hope the people there are proud of this guy!

Democrats started lying during Bill Clinton's first campaign and they haven't stopped in over twenty years. The last two Democrats to tell the truth were Walter Mondale and Michael Dukakis: Mondale: “Let’s tell the truth. Mr. Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won’t tell you. I just did." Dukakis: "[If my wife were raped and murdered, I would not want the perpetrator to get the death penalty.]I've opposed the death penalty during all of my life. I don't see any evidence that it's a deterrent and I think there are better and more effective ways to deal with violent crime." Notice, they both lost in landslides - no wonder Democrats no longer tell the truth.

"THE golden opportunity" to which you refer can never happen unless 2014 brings veto-proof majorities to the House and the Senate. Outside of that, you can't force our "leaders" to do anything.

Jay Carney on 10/10/2012: "... it is inherently risky to represent the United States in some countries around the world that are very dangerous, and we sometimes -- except in situations like this -- forget that we have thousands of Americans abroad, bravely representing us and our values in places like Libya and other regions of the world that can be very dangerous, in countries and regions where being a representative of the American government can be risky." Translation: They knew they could die, so why is everyone making such a big deal of it? This line of reasoning is typical of this administration. It's OK if people die as long as it doesn't hurt Obama. Our diplomats were aware that Benghazi was potentially dangerous. I doubt they were aware that the military would not be allowed to help them when it became dangerous.

Jay Carney on 10/10/2012: "... it is inherently risky to represent the United States in some countries around the world that are very dangerous, and we sometimes -- except in situations like this -- forget that we have thousands of Americans abroad, bravely representing us and our values in places like Libya and other regions of the world that can be very dangerous, in countries and regions where being a representative of the American government can be risky." Translation: They knew they could die, so why is everyone making such a big deal of it? This line of reasoning is typical of this administration. It's OK if people die as long as it doesn't hurt Obama. Our diplomats were aware that Benghazi was potentially dangerous. I doubt they were aware that the military would not be allowed to help them when it became dangerous.

When you say, "Courts martial," are you talking about basketball courts? tennis courts? Are you talking about a "court," or about a "martial," or about a "court martial?" From http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/court-martial: "court–mar·tial noun \'k?rt-?mär-sh?l, plural; courts–martial also court-MARTIALS (emphasis, mine)" (George257, yours was a silly post, but that kind of stuff bugs me - it's as silly as sportscasters saying, "he has 26 RBI," rather than saying, "he has 26 RBI's.")

The reason gay people demand public endorsement and acceptance of their lifestyle is because they honestly believe that such acknowledgement and approval will remove the guilt they feel for their sin. Unfortunately, for them, only by confessing their sin, receiving Jesus as their Savior, and repenting from their sin will they experience the removal of guilt they so desperately long for. And take note: The radical gay activists will portray my entire comment to be hate speech. Gays really do need Jesus. I hope all Christians will be bold and witness to their gay friends and co-workers. Telling them that they are sinning, that they need a Savior, and that they need to repent is the truest demonstration of Christian compassion toward gays.

dogoodscience Wrote: "Dont forget about the fact Cannabis is non-toxic and PROVEN to cure cancer." Riiiight --- and fossil fuels are dangerous and PROVEN to cause global warming.

Michael1210 Wrote:"I taught at-risk high school students in LA at a public school where 60% of the families lived below the poverty line... For the poorest students from broken homes who faced challenges Mr Prager has never experienced, having breakfast and lunch made a tremendous difference in their behavior and their ability to concentrate and learn. The heartless Mr. Prager is once again expounding on a subject he knows little about and is guided by ideology rather than facts." WE HAVE A WINNER!! Congratulations, Michael, on the most ridiculous comment of the day! Prager's "expounding" is based on ideology AND facts, while your comment is based on ignorance and FEEEEELINGS (which confirms everything Prager says about the left).

"I want the truth on this case. It doesn't add up, nor has it from the start." It doesn't add up? Let me do the elementary math for you. Two Islamist brothers hated America and chose to bomb a soft target. They killed and maimed innocent people. One of the criminals is dead, the other one deserves to die - but not before he gives up any other confederates who were in on this act of terror. There - 1+1=2 - simple, isn't it?