In response to:

Congressmen Offer Economic Plans, Laud Paul Ryan at 'Conversations with Conservatives'

Col Bat Guano Wrote: Nov 14, 2012 9:40 PM
Both these chords presented by Lopez and Simmons would resonate with the right amount people. Some conservative voters stayed home last week turned off by the Republican robotic theme of numbers and Mitt Romney's bottom line. Where's the soul? Others voted for Democrats despite their absolute absolute nose dive into libertinism as displayed at their convention because they identified with the particular candidate. Mitt Romney's focus on his business acumen may have reminded them of how much they hate their boss, who probably says the same damn things, even though they are stuck with him because of 0bamanomics. The juxtaposition of seemingly contrasting issues in this election isn't that hard to understand when you add the missing part.
"Why did Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan lose?” Jonathan Weisman, a congressional reporter for the New York Times, posed this challenging, yet important question to Republican congressmen who took part in this month’s Conservations with Conservatives. Among the election results, the congress members also discussed the fiscal cliff, the lame duck session, immigration and Paul Ryan.

Rep. Tim Huelskamp (KS-01), along with Rep. Raúl Labrador (ID-01), Rep. Jim Jordan (OH-04) and Rep. Steve King (IA-05), discussed the future of the GOP, as well as a host of policy issues they will face as members of the 113th Congress. The Heritage...
Thursday, June 20 | 02:35 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:35 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:35 AM ET
Thursday, June 20 | 02:35 AM ET