In response to:

Colorado Democrat: Use a Ballpoint Pen to Fight a Gunman

Col Bat Guano Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 9:27 AM
No, they're just all smoking dope now before the session starts!
Kevin1824 Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 9:48 AM
I live in Colorado and was at the senate hearings last Friday. I was totally appalled at the spectical I saw unfold before me. I am still stuned at the total stupidity demonstrated by the senators favoring the gun bills. As this guy said, that people should wait untill the attacker stops to reload to then take him down. It is presented as if this happens all the time during shootings. I started investigating how many times that has happened since the Columbine shootings here in 1999.
So far, I have found only ONE. That was the one referenced, the Tuscon shooting where Gabby Gifford was shot. But the Democrats make it sound like it happens all the time. There is no lie too grotesque that they won't tell to further their agenda.
Buck O Wrote: Feb 20, 2013 9:39 AM
Dropping acid, too. Is there a difference between being high and being crazy?

I touched on this yesterday but it's worth mentioning again. Recently, Colorado Democrat Jessie Uliberri argued people should defend themselves against a madman shooter with.... ballpoint pens.

Two things wrong with this. The first being that Uliberri argues people should waiting until a crazy person reloads before taking action, or in other words, wait until they are done shooting people. The use of a firearm for defense in this case wouldn't require a waiting period but rather would stop a madman from continuing his rampage. The second, ballpoint pens?...

Related Tags: Self Defense Colorado