Even if the gay marriage debate favors Republicans at the moment, the shift towards support for gay marriage is happening rather quickly, even among devoutly religious young people. Social conservatives who believe it is important to keep the definition of marriage limited to one man and one woman cannot rest on their laurels and just assume the tide will shift back in their favor. The current arguments against SSM are not compelling to people who are young and/or irreligious. To my more socially conservative Republican friends, I’d say either you need to come up with more persuasive arguments fast or we need to be talking with people on the other side to arrange changes in the law that somehow satisfy both sides.
Conventional wisdom argues that opposition to gay marriage hurt Republicans in the recent election cycle, but nothing in the numbers suggests that this is true.
In the four liberal states where advocates for same-sex marriage won their victories, the redefinition of marriage proved much less popular than Barack Obama. In Maryland, for instance, Obama cruised to victory with 62 percent of the vote, but same-sex marriage squeaked by with just 52 percent. In other words, more than one out of six of Obama supporters voted with Republicans, not their fellow Democrats, against same sex marriage.
In Maryland, Maine, Washington...
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Cannon: Obama’s Damaging Admission
- Mitchell: To Punch a Liberal
- Calculations: The Myth of Michelle Obama's "Food Desert"
- Mitchell: Canada Wants to Join the Government Stupidity Contest
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Ransom: Liberals Suck at Math and Eyeballs
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Hunter: Creating Monsters: Terrorism, Welfare and “Celebrating Diversity”
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Giles: Jihad On Our Tax Dollars? Screw That.
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Cannon: Obama’s Damaging Admission
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Ransom: Liberals Suck at Math and Eyeballs
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Glick: Time to Confront Obama
- Hunter: Creating Monsters: Terrorism, Welfare and “Celebrating Diversity”
- O'Reilly: Droning On
- Hawkins: 7 Things Every Moderate Muslim Should Believe
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Giles: Jihad On Our Tax Dollars? Screw That.
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Sowell: Genes and Racism
- Starnes: Saudi National Questioned in Boston Attack was on Terror Watch List
- Sowell: Immigration Gambles
- Williams: Academic Cesspools
- Coulter: The Problem Isn't Just Illegal Immigration, It's Legal Immigration, Too
- Adams: Letters to a Young Progressive
- Hawkins: 20 Nasty, Weird and Sexist Liberal Cracks About Women
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Malkin: America's Insane Asylum for Jihadists, Hustlers and Frauds
- Malkin: A National Security History Lesson for Marco Rubio
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
- Mitchell: To Punch a Liberal
- DeHaven: Rubio Blames GOP for Government Dependency
- Calculations: The Myth of Michelle Obama's "Food Desert"
- Mitchell: Canada Wants to Join the Government Stupidity Contest
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
- Mitchell: To Punch a Liberal
- DeHaven: Rubio Blames GOP for Government Dependency
- Calculations: The Myth of Michelle Obama's "Food Desert"
- Mitchell: Canada Wants to Join the Government Stupidity Contest
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Ransom: Liberals Suck at Math and Eyeballs
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Giles: Jihad On Our Tax Dollars? Screw That.
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Hunter: Creating Monsters: Terrorism, Welfare and “Celebrating Diversity”
- Beauprez: All that Ammo
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
Saturday, May 25 | 12:30 AM ET
- Parker: How Abortion Has Changed America
- Schlichter: Can Marco Rubio Save Marco Rubio From Himself?
- Ransom: The Dishonorable Liberal Order of Regulatory Scientists
- Bialosky: Now Obama Wants Your Pension
- Kieffer: BENGHAZIGATE: Obama’s Secret Gun-Running Program
- Barone: Benghazi Report Revives Troubling Questions
- Mitchell: To Punch a Liberal
- DeHaven: Rubio Blames GOP for Government Dependency
- Calculations: The Myth of Michelle Obama's "Food Desert"
- Mitchell: Canada Wants to Join the Government Stupidity Contest
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 5 hours ago
- Bobby Jindal: Paternalistic, big-government liberalism is the biggest loser here Erika Johnsen 5 hours ago
- Super Nannies: EU bans olive oils, Germany ponders Autobahn speed limit Mary Katharine Ham 6 hours ago
- Pope: Second look at letting atheists into heaven? Allahpundit 7 hours ago
- Revealed: Holder personally vetted Rosen warrant, DOJ fought for prolonged secret monitoring of accounts Allahpundit 7 hours ago
- GOP widening Sebelius shakedown probe Ed Morrissey 8 hours ago












Beg pardon; why are there two sides in the matter of marriage? Two sides to "satisfy." .
Marriage is hard to change after eons of uniting a man and a woman. A "shift" towards support for faux mariage is irrelevant overall. No pair of beaux will truly become each others' spouses. They are known to cohabit. Their right to marry is plainly absurd.
Addressing me?
I live in the real world. Marriage in the real world is what my parents had, and yours as well. (Assuming you're legit.)
You'll never legislate a genuine marriage between two of the same sex. Because no matter what the purchased slip of paper says, your organs will still be useless for a marital act. A sphincter muscle can't give you marriage in the real world.