In response to:

GOP: Just Say No to Liberal Moderators

clubgitmo Wrote: Oct 13, 2012 6:40 AM
Befre these debates even began I questioned why the GOP would agree to this. Shame on them.
dtaylor944 Wrote: Oct 13, 2012 12:29 PM
Do you mean why the gOP would agree to this debate or this moderator. They had no choice and still came out a winner. The future is looking very dim. Romney and Ryan are not looking just to save the rich they are also looking to save the working class, as many as they can that still have a job. I doubt seriously the Main stream media is telling that when the Bush tax cuts die they die on everyone. The rates on all are going to drasticlly rise. Then we will have chaos and government take over then the new world order will step in. The US govt. can not run anything efficiently. Look at the postal service, look at social security, look at anything the government runs and you will find disaster so yes let's have them run the health care.

This year, Americans are being subjected to another presidential election season of unfair and unbalanced debates.

After two debates, the American public has seen liberal Jim Lehrer of PBS exercising no control over the proceedings and liberal Martha Raddatz of ABC allowing Vice President Joe Biden to interrupt Congressman Paul Ryan 82 times.

Both Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have done well in debate environments that were not fair. In the first debate, Governor Mitt Romney clearly won with an outstanding performance; however, Lehrer allowed President Obama four additional minutes of air time....

Related Tags: liberal