1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Problem With Santorum

Clifton23 Wrote: Mar 02, 2012 10:47 AM
Ann, so conveniently "uses" the constitution when she wants to. When she wants to promote Mitt Romney who she had obviously supported since day one. But no candidate understands the "constitution" and would follow it better than Ron Paul who she does not support. I can not hardly stand to read her BS anymore. Romney is just another Big Federal Govt Republican.... He will not do one thing to reduce spending, the government, or anything else. And he can not beat Obama anyway. Good luck Ann... You are on the wrong horse. Ron Paul would school you on the Federalist and the constitution. Furthermore, he would implement as much as he could as President..
In response to:

Newt Presents a Fresh New Virtual Face

Clifton23 Wrote: Dec 08, 2011 10:40 AM
the REAL NEWT !!! http://www.campaignforliberty.com/blog.php?view=36799
In response to:

Newt Presents a Fresh New Virtual Face

Clifton23 Wrote: Dec 08, 2011 10:20 AM
The REAL Newt...... Gingrich Resumé Newt Gingrich served in Congress from 1979 until 1999. His first Freedom Index score (when it was known as the "Conservative Index") was 84, but it nose-dived from there. He achieved his lowest scores as Speaker of the House. Gingrich consistently lost points for his propensity to support unconstitutional legislation. 1. Education - Gingrich backed federal education funding from his earliest days in office, though the Constitution gives absolutely no authority over education to any branch of the federal government. He helped garner support to create President Jimmy Carter's Department of Education in 1979. Since then educational spending has soared while educational standards have plummeted. Things got
In response to:

So A Comatose Guy Walks Into a Bar

Clifton23 Wrote: Sep 15, 2011 9:34 AM
Why don't you idiots that always look to the government to take care of you, think about this. I will try to give you an example: Until the patient starts asking the price of the care (ex. a knee replacement, apendectomy, one more night in the hospital, MRI, etc) the "prices" will continue to soar. Insurance company involvement have also made medical prices soar. It is all another ponsy scheme to make people buy high priced insurance mostly because of government involvement. PRICES WOULD BE SO HIGH.... HOSPITALS ARE MAKING A FORTUNE... THEY ARE A "BUSINESS FOR PROFIT"......Think about it !!!!!!!!! Educate yourself !!!!! Think for yourself !!!!! Take care of yourself !!! FREE MARKET, NO GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT.. RON PAUL FOR PRESIDENT 2012
In response to:

So A Comatose Guy Walks Into a Bar

Clifton23 Wrote: Sep 15, 2011 9:26 AM
Why don't you idiots think about this. I will try to give you an example: Until the patient starts asking the price of the care (ex. a knee replacement, apendectomy, one more night in the hospital, MRI, etc) the "prices" will continue to soar. Insurance company involvement have also made medical prices soar. It is all another ponsy scheme to make people buy high priced insurance mostly because of government involvement. Think about it !!!!!!!!! Educate yourself !!!!! Think for yourself !!!!!
In response to:

So A Comatose Guy Walks Into a Bar

Clifton23 Wrote: Sep 15, 2011 9:12 AM
Who ever wrote this is too stupid to understand Ron Paul. "So what do you think Ron Paul should do if a campaign manager goes into a hospital, uninsured, with pneumonia? Should Paul hold a bake sale or ask a church to help before he goes in? What if they can't raise the half-a-million they may need? Or does the hospital simply access your bank account to make sure you have money on hand before you enter?" Ron Paul is suggesting that a huge government program is not the answer, but that free market and self responsibility is the answer. And all the poor people we had before all of these systems were not left in the street to die.
In response to:

Debate Leaves Republican Field Unaltered

Clifton23 Wrote: Aug 13, 2011 10:47 AM
Akennas2: you must be government educated and can not understand this one simple question or statement. WHAT AMERICA IS DOING AROUND THE WORLD, FOREIGN POLICY, DOMESTIC POLICY IS NOT WORKING. Most people who do not have the intellegence to understand Dr. Paul make ignorant subjective statements like he is a "dangerously naive loon". Good luck paying you taxes to the elitist, professional politicians that make you "feel" good. My suggestion would be to start educating yourself again by reading some intellegent books, articles. Last statement to see if you understand. Do you feel more safe today than you did 20-40 years ago? Has any of your family lost a life or limb in one of these military driven wars?
In response to:

Debate Leaves Republican Field Unaltered

Clifton23 Wrote: Aug 13, 2011 10:40 AM
Yes, there will always be a reason to fight another war. Libya, Iran, Iraq, Vietnam, Korea. How long can we continue and afford to police the world. India & Pakistan have had nukes for years (and been fight amoung themselves). Iran can probably buy one from Russia right now. Russia and Iran are tight.
In response to:

Debate Leaves Republican Field Unaltered

Clifton23 Wrote: Aug 13, 2011 10:30 AM
I really do not know his stand on unions, but since he is true to liberty, I doubt he support or denounces unions. This meaning that the government should not intervine in business, period. But I also believe Ron Paul would level the playing field for imports for all other countries including the far east. And level the field on taxes, by lowering them to all and creating a TRUE incentive to do business(manufacture) in the United States again.
In response to:

Debate Leaves Republican Field Unaltered

Clifton23 Wrote: Aug 13, 2011 10:24 AM
I agree with you last statement. You must add Romney to that list tho.
1 - 10 Next
Saturday, June 02 | 11:17 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 11:17 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 11:17 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 11:17 AM ET