In response to:

Redefining Marriage Sign of a Lost Society

Cleombrotus2011 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 6:33 PM
Still don't understand the rationale behind handing over the definition of an institution that is sexual in its essence to the psycho-sexually dysfunctional.
Cleombrotus2011 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 6:35 PM
Maybe they think that by putting the state's imprimatur on it, that will somehow mitigate the angst?
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:01 PM
Or maybe they think that by not denying them the fundamental right to choose the consenting adult they want to marry, they can enjoy the same legal treatment as other married couples.

marriage effects our treatment in multiple ways by the civil codes and laws of both state and federal Gov.

Everything from Soc Security to taxes, to immigration, to military benefits etc.

Now I did not get married to have those things but they are a product of the marriage. So if a woman loves another woman as much as I love my wife why should they be denied by the state the same things I my wife and I enjoy?
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:29 PM
". . . they want to marry, they can enjoy the same legal treatment as other married couples." Tinsoldierspew).

Gosh; can't your kid get a woman to tie the knot with him, ANYWHERE, P i m p ? That's the best option.


nawlins72 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:34 PM
When are you and your ilk leaving this "land of liberty" to find your promised land? Don't waste precious time, Dread. Go now.
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:40 PM
Dread unable to come up with a rational rebuttal?

Dont feel bad, we dont expect much more of you but feel free to continue to show TH readers your level of intelligence
Dreadnaught011 Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 8:20 PM


Which of us is intelligent?

You are clamoring for the sodomy set's right to marry. Noowlins calls liberty the madness of your beau's beauner up the r e c t u m. Not too swift, I'd say. I guess I'm dumb, all right! Lol!

nawlins72 Wrote: Nov 27, 2012 12:02 AM
" I guess I'm dumb, all right!"

Yes, yes you are.

One significant development in the recent election was votes in four states approving same sex marriage initiatives. Until now, all previous state referenda to approve same sex marriage – 32 of them - failed.

The Wall Street Journal editorial page – a place where conservatives usually turn for intellectual capital – saw this as cause for celebration.

According to the Journal, marriage definition should come from voters, not from court orders. Americans, they argue, have “shown themselves more than capable of changing their views on gay marriage the democratic way.”

In other words, our definition of marriage should follow process, not...