In response to:

Rand Paul is Filibustering John Brennan's Nomination - Here's Why

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Mar 06, 2013 4:10 PM
"Loser"? That is you looking in a mirror again.
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Mar 06, 2013 4:30 PM
Yeah, she didn't tell us who the "who' is did she? However judging by her inane comments in the past I think she might refer to Sen Paul. If she meant Holder, BINGO..he's got the blood of our border agents and the innocent Mexicans on his hands, he has a murderers heart, a reprobate mind just like his master. Prison for life would be too good for the likes of Holder..he is Barry's firewall, enabling Barry to 'rule' unconstitutionally. At least these three
Senators are great examples of STATESMEN rather than wimpy spineless Jelly fish that infest the GOP.

Today at 11:45 AM, Kentucky Sen. Ran Paul took to the Senate floor to filibuster John Brennan, who is President Obama's nominee to lead the CIA. President Obama's recent nominees have faced rocky roads - Chuck Hagel for Defense more than all the others - but none rose to the level of a grandstanding filibuster.

And it's not because of Benghazi.

No, leading Republicans made their Benghazi stand against Sen. Chuck Hagel. But Sens....