In response to:

Jim Nabors and How Liberalism May Win Its Way to Defeat

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 12:04 PM
"...when took the White House aback as well, electing Richard Nixon twice." ___________________________________________________________________ Kurt, if you are going to spend the energy on sharing your thoughts and formulating an argument, articulating is a key element. Pardon me, sir, I do not understand the above segment for your comment. If someone could clarify----thank you.
KDwg24 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 12:31 PM
Sure! You found the line in the peice that most amused me writing it - and it's a tribute to my editor that he didn't "fix" it. Look a line or so up where the Silent Majority is "taken aback"-- "took...aback" in the next senetence is a play off that.

Is Gomer Pyle one of the Four Horseman of the Liberal Apocalypse?

The superficially surprising thing about last week’s announcement that Jim Nabors had married his boyfriend of four decades was not so much the nuptials themselves – I always felt Gomer was just going through the motions with Lou-Ann Poovie. Rather, it was the cultural reaction to the news that a huge star back in his day had decided he would tell even if we didn’t ask.

There was no reaction. America, including conservatives regardless of their feelings about gay marriage, collectively shrugged their shoulders and generally wished the elderly...