In response to:

Brace for Impact: Dianne Feinstein Gun Control Legislation Coming Thursday

clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 8:51 AM
RE: Fast and Furious and Benghazi It is fascinating that the primary defense used by the heads of both of these departments; State Dep't. and D.O.J. is that they did not read the very emails or cables directed to them by name, alerting them to the looming catastrophe that they've both been faced with. "I did not see that cable sent to me by the ambassador." OH.....okay. Very well, you can go now----no harm no foul...
clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 8:53 AM
"I did not read that email directed to me about running unmonitored guns across the border into Mexico and into the hands of violent drug thugs."

Well.....why didn't you sayyyyyy soooooo. You can leave now, Mr. Holder. Thank you for clearing this all up.....
clarityseeker2 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 9:00 AM
No accountability on the basis of, "I did not see or read those communications directed to me by individuals who were trying to warn me of impending disaster"

Very simple, very clean, very convenient...
Leslie96 Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:32 PM
They are just so qualified for their jobs, no?

California Senator Dianne Feinstein is expected to introduce new gun control legislation today in an effort to reinstate the "assault" weapons ban of the Clinton era, but Feinstein's legislation goes far beyond simply banning scary look guns. The bill being introduced today covers a wide range of handsguns, rifles, and shotguns. Firearms lawfully purchased and  included in the legislation as "banned" must be registered.


Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:       

120 specifically-named firearms;       

-Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine...