And so? They failed their test of whether they were Christians or not. Seems Barack Obama once proclaimed he was a devout follower of Jesus Christ. But, to date since campaigning in 2008, he has little, if anything, to show that.

In the last sentence, I meant "conservatives" instead of "Christians."

IMO, someone cannot call themselves a Christian and a Democrat/regressive/liberal/leftist. But given how many leftist/liberal offshoots of Christianity seem to have arisen, perhaps that's how they can.

"Conservatives are anti-people, particular[ly] the unrich"? Please, try to think first, to avoid being self-embarrassing, if that matters to you. But since you opened the subjects, please list a dozen or so specific examples that show Conservatives are anti-people, particularly to the poor. Also list the same number of examples as to why, presumably, that regressives/liberals/leftists are pro-people, particularly to the poor. Tell you what: Let's take off the table the RLLs' pro-abortion stance. And re: someone cannot be a Christian and a conservative: You base that on what revelations or examples, or both? Oh, yes, give us several examples of how Christians fail to help the poor and sick.

Many many many Caucasians in the U.S. have Native American blood, depending on when their European ancestors arrived. One group in my ancestry arrived in the U.S. about 1700. Another in the mid-to-late 1700s. One of my great-great-grandmothers was a Native American.

"You kids want to blame the adults who are fixing your mess." My, what a pithy statement. Typical, though, of the Democrat/progressive/liberal/leftist mind and soul that must always sling barbs and ad hominems to overcome their insecurity and mask their intellectual and moral bankruptcy. If what's occurred in Congress from 2007-2011, the Senate from 2007-2012, and the White House from 2009 to the present are what you consider the adults fixing the mess, then, sir, I suggest that your powers of observations are deficient or your rigid ideology has blinded you to reality, or both.

He comes, as the other Democrat/progressive/liberal/leftist bots do, to distract and inject chaos. We all should be much wiser and just ignore their adolescent taunts, typical DPLL ad hominems, and intellectual and moral bankruptcy.

Do you have the ability to actually engage in civil adult discourse? It's a rhetorical question.

You know, OM, you sound like an urban cowboy who's never stepped foot in a corral, ridden a horse, done an honest day's work and actually found need for a pickup truck with all it's bells and whistles that UCs load them up with. And you've never worn a real cowboy hat, say a straw one, that's bent here and there, and got some sweat stains. When you start railing and calling people with whom you disagree things such as cowards, traitors and un-American and cult-members, you might exercise some adult common sense and reconsider. That's because when rational and intelligent people see such hyperbolic statements, they dismiss comments such as yours immediately.

So you've read Ryan's budget? Want to share why you've called it an "odious piece of trash"? Perhaps you forgot that the Senate just voted 97-0 against whatever Obama called his budget? You remark insinuates you know Obama's budget, so how about enlightening us as to its strong points and how those help our country? And maybe I missed something, but aren't the Democrats still the Senate's majority? Oh, yes: Did we have a president named Chimpy? I don't seem to recall him.