In response to:

Once a Critic of Deficits, Obama Now Goes for Broke

christiancon Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:10 PM
Saul Alinsky tactics- so why is everyone so shocked?
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:21 PM
Moose Hunter Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:59 PM
LMAO, James, at least you got your point across.

Sometimes you have to give this website time to get its act together when you enter a comment, otherwise you will duplicate and triplicate. Kinda like the government.
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:20 PM
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:20 PM
Not shocked, just sick on the stomach.
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:20 PM
Not shocked, just sick on the stomach.
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:20 PM
Not shocked, just sick on the stomach.
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:19 PM
Not shocked, just sick on the stomach.
James____Tx Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 9:19 PM
Not shocked, just sick on the stomach.
"You don't have to be a deficit hawk to be disturbed by the growing gap between revenues and expenses," said Sen. Barack Obama during a Nov. 3, 2005, debate on the Senate floor. At the time, Obama had been a senator for less than a year and the federal budget deficit was in fact shrinking, from $248 billion in fiscal 2006 to $160 billion in fiscal 2007. Still, Obama seemed deeply concerned about the deficit, and he appeared to believe it when he said the only way to close the shortfalls was to force Congress to pay for what it...