In response to:

Why a Good Person Can Vote Against Same-Sex Marriage

Mainstream_American Wrote: Oct 30, 2012 11:32 AM
Prager pointed out six examples BESIDES the adoption example. He's also too restrained to point out that it's STUPID to try to redefine marriage (but as a commenter, I don't have to be as restrained). Marriage has had a specific definition given by Christ; a definition that will never change.

Next week voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington will vote on whether to redefine marriage to include same-sex couples.

Given that there are good people on both sides of this issue, how are we to explain their opposing views?

The primary explanation is this: Proponents and opponents ask two different questions.

Proponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is keeping the definition of marriage as man-woman fair to gays? Opponents of same-sex marriage ask: Is same-sex marriage good for society?

Few on either side honestly address the question of the other side. Opponents of same-sex marriage rarely acknowledge...