1 - 4
I'm asking this because I really want to know. This article states "ATT's verbiage, instructing nations to "take the necessary legislative and administrative measure to adapt, as necessary, national laws and regulations to implement the obligations of this treaty, is too gray, hence leaving room to dilute or supersede the Second Amendment." I would like to know specifically how this is too gray? How could this lead to superseding our Constitution?
Treaty with Tripoli 1797 As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims],—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
Marriage has been redefined time and time again trough history.
For those that think it's a choice, I would like to know when they chose to be heterosexual and how they came to that conclusion. :-)
1 - 4