In response to:

Matt Romney, Throwback

chris463 Wrote: Nov 02, 2012 11:21 PM
Mitt lies and lies and it set a tone of distrust. When he lies to the public he is stealing the truth and that is disrespectful to the voters.
chris463 Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 4:04 PM
I'm not confused. Mitt is confused. What happen to his firm belief in pro-choice just like his mother because a dear relative died from an illegal abortion?
Mitt laughed at Stephanopoulos, Jan 2012, when asked about restricting birth control. Yet, he told Huckabee in Oct. 2011 he would gladly sign Personhood into law if elected. Personhood would ban hormonal oral contraceptives and IUD's.
Personhood would also restrict or ban IVF Treatment. May 2012 his son Matt had twins using a Surrogate. She had previously given birth to one other child for Matt and his wife.
Mitt states there are no bills to restrict women's reproductive rights. Paul Ryan has endorsed HR 212 along with most Republicans in Congress. Plus, Mitt said he would sign it.
Neal from PA Wrote: Nov 03, 2012 11:17 AM

Say...what...give some examples of what lies and tones you speak...sounds like you are describing Obama, not Romney...or are we just feeling the tone of liberal confusion, yet again.

The policies Mitt Romney advocates might be quite new after four years of this administration, but his language is a golden oldie. By now, the retro phrases that punctuate his vocabulary have acquired a name of their own: Mittisms.

Michael Barbaro and Ashley Parker, a couple of New York Times reporters, compiled an impressive list of them in a news story that ran in our paper the other Sunday. To run through them is to take a trip into the past:

When he fell in love with his wife, Mitt Romney wasn't just in love, he was "smitten."...