Previous 21 - 30 Next
To answer the question: It is secure in Washington DC. The rest of the country is on it's own.
Since this reporter acted in an entirely unprofessional and childish manner, hit him in his pocketbook. Just do not purchase any newspapers or articles from this obviously biased propagandist..
In response to:


Chris3668 Wrote: Jul 17, 2014 3:04 PM
This is the narrative the executive branch chooses to propagate: If you disagree with our policies or practices, it is due to the racial bias in your background. It is not about competence or incompetence, where I will disagree with the Executive branch. See, I can agree to disagree with your policies based upon performance, not the person.
You have been fooled. Both parties are responsible for the government we currently have. The founders wanted a limited federal government, a concept which became inconsequential after the civil war. They want us blaming each other because of our party loyalty, instead of looking at what the "ruling class" does to the taxpayers - You and I.
In response to:

White House Defends Immigration Actions

Chris3668 Wrote: Jul 08, 2014 6:56 AM
Another fine example of lawlessness by this administration. Load the illegals on a plane and drop them off in their native country. Next?
In response to:

Federal Judge to Supreme Court: 'STFU'

Chris3668 Wrote: Jul 08, 2014 6:47 AM
The ancient Greeks exposed the children that had defects till they died, a practice many considered barbaric. The Germans in WWII considered the Jewish people to be less than human, which they experimented on, gassed, and worked to death. Now we appoint judges that make rulings that allow us to kill the unborn. This judge's moral compass is a bit out of kilter and his lack of respect for the Supreme Court is rather evident. I am very glad I do not live in Nebraska.
Another example of administrative lawlessness. It is only good for the plebes, not the ruling class.
According to my last recollection, this law has been changed 38 times since it's adoption. I and sure that the congress did not debate those changes, nor passed them into law.
That is a rather interesting and partisan viewpoint. What good is health insurance if your doctor does not participate in the insurance pool?
That is an interesting question. The only thing this law did was create insurance mandates for the citizen. Healthcare is available at a few partitioner's, as many doctor's are disassociating their practices from the ACA. Where is the question concerning the accountability of the legislator's who passed this horrendous bill without vetting it, super troll?
In response to:

Dissenters in a One-Party Statehouse

Chris3668 Wrote: Jul 07, 2014 8:16 AM
Job description one: A legislator will read all bills before voting on the proposed bill. This is how the ACA was passed by the most "transparent" administration in history. In my state, the band of legislators just passed a bill that basically says if you do not get out of the passing lane, you will receive a ticket. Let's apply some basic logic: If you pass at the posted speed limit, and another vehicle wants to go 30 miles over the speed limit, I can be charged for impeding traffic. So a speeder does not get a citation and you do. The political class are idiots and we continue to elect them to the local, state, and federal houses without care of thought.
Previous 21 - 30 Next