In response to:

The Complex Truth About the Second Amendment

Texas Chris Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 10:26 AM

All rights are limited by the peripheral natural rights of others. "...permits for a political protest," to protect private property. "...outlaw child pornography," to protect children from exploitation. "...forbid incitement to violence," to protect private property. "...allow libel suits and more" to protect property and privacy. We have acceptable laws against murder and reckless discharge of firearms, which protect persons and property. But to restrict the private ownership of firearms is a direct violation of the intent and letter of the law. Period.

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Jeff_Georgia Wrote: Feb 14, 2013 1:43 PM

Well said, C102.

Flag as Offensive

Post Comment

Read Full Story

The Complex Truth About the Second Amendment

The debate on gun control lately has been going like this: Liberals propose various restrictions on allowable firearms, acceptable owners and approved ammunition. Conservatives exclaim, "Second Amendment!" And the debate, at least in the mind of the latter group, is over.

The Second Amendment, they believe, is not just one important provision of our basic government document. It's the first and last word on the subject of firearms.

Viewing the proposals offered since the Sandy Hook massacre, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., concludes the supporters intend "to completely GUT our Second Amendment rights." The Utah Sheriffs' Association warned President Barack...

Related Tags: Gun Control Gun Ban Second Amendment Gun Control Debate